[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] libxl: Allow multiple serial ports on HVM domain creation
On gio, 2014-07-31 at 00:24 +0000, White, Edmund H wrote: > diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_dm.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_dm.c > index addacdb..0b83ed9 100644 > --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_dm.c > +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_dm.c > @@ -196,8 +196,26 @@ static char ** > libxl__build_device_model_args_old(libxl__gc *gc, > int nr_set_cpus = 0; > char *s; > > - if (b_info->u.hvm.serial) { > - flexarray_vappend(dm_args, "-serial", b_info->u.hvm.serial, > NULL); > + if (b_info->u.hvm.serial || b_info->u.hvm.serial_list) { > + if ( b_info->u.hvm.serial && b_info->u.hvm.serial_list ) > + { > + LOG(ERROR, "%s: Both serial and serial_list set", > + __func__); > Looking at LOG-->LIBXL_LOG's definition in tools/libxl/libxl_internal.h, it looks like __func__ is already included in there, so I don't think you need to include it explicitly. > + return NULL; > + } > + if (b_info->u.hvm.serial) { > + flexarray_vappend(dm_args, > + "-serial", b_info->u.hvm.serial, NULL); > + } else if (b_info->u.hvm.serial_list) { > + char **p; > + for (p = b_info->u.hvm.serial_list; > + *p; > + p++) { > Not a big deal, but, doesn't the for fit in one line (a matter of taste, though, I guess, as I don't think libxl coding style forbids this). Regards, Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) Attachment:
signature.asc _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |