[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Bisected Xen-unstable: "Segment register inaccessible for d1v0" when starting HVM guest on intel
>>> On 04.07.14 at 08:58, <feng.wu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@xxxxxxxx] >> Sent: Friday, July 04, 2014 2:50 PM >> To: Wu, Feng >> Cc: Andrew Cooper; Sander Eikelenboom; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: RE: Bisected Xen-unstable: "Segment register inaccessible for d1v0" >> when starting HVM guest on intel >> >> >>> On 04.07.14 at 04:51, <feng.wu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > I try to reproduce this issue on my side, but I find that the per-VCPU >> > guest >> > runstate shared memory area >> > is not registered by the HVM guest, so in update_runstate_area(), it always >> > returns 1 and bypass the >> > remaining logic. I am wondering how it is registered in your HVM guest, > were >> > you running an PVHVM guest >> > or HVM guest with PV drivers, I think which may register this area. >> > >> > Jan, do you have some ideas about this, Thanks a lot! >> >> You should have clarified what kind of guest(s) you tried. Pv-ops Linux, >> afaict, appears to register these areas not just in PV mode. > > I tried two kinds of guests: > 1. RHEL 6.5 with its own kernel. > 2. I built a 3.11.4 kernel in RHEL 6.5 and boot from this new kernel. > > Both the them don't register the 'runstate shared memory area', do I > need to configure something else in .config when building the kernel? For one asking a question like this is pretty pointless without attaching the .config you used. And second I think you could have checked the code yourself: xen_hvm_setup_cpu_clockevents() calling xen_setup_runstate_info() gets built when CONFIG_XEN_PVHVM is defined. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |