[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [v5][PATCH 0/5] xen: add Intel IGD passthrough support
On 2014/6/25 18:32, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 06:28:34PM +0800, Chen, Tiejun wrote:On 2014/6/25 18:21, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 06:06:50PM +0800, Chen, Tiejun wrote:On 2014/6/25 17:59, Paolo Bonzini wrote:Il 25/06/2014 11:55, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:You're saying we will reserve a free BAR to address thoseinformation toexpose to guest, but which device does this free BAR belong to? Thevideodevice? Or PCH/MCH?If you just want to pass a couple of IDs, then don't, it's a waste. But I still don't know what problem you are trying to solve, looking at guest driver did not help.It's not just a couple of IDs, it's also random fields of the MCH configuration space. Grep drivers/gpu/drm/i915 for bridge_dev.Paolo, No, we're not pointing the bridge_dev here, which is a host bridge at 00:00.0. Here it should be a ISA bridge at 00:1f.0. Please see intel_detect_pch() to know why we need this. Thanks TiejunSo what if you dont? if (!pch) DRM_DEBUG_KMS("No PCH found.\n"); Is that all? Seems harmless enough.I don't read the whole driver completely so I don't know now. I guess the driver may go other live path even without this setting in a live, or this is a real bug to this driver on Intel platform. But anyway, I think we should guarantee the driver work under the same configuration as the native in the passthrough case. Thanks TiejunJust get it working as a first step. Then address theoretical issues in follow-up patches. I'm not sure if we can simply. So I will post this to the driver developer to ask more. Thanks Tiejun _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |