[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [v5][PATCH 0/5] xen: add Intel IGD passthrough support
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 06:15:29PM +0800, Chen, Tiejun wrote: > On 2014/6/25 18:09, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:59:21AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > >>Il 25/06/2014 11:55, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto: > >>>>You're saying we will reserve a free BAR to address those information to > >>>>expose to guest, but which device does this free BAR belong to? The video > >>>>device? Or PCH/MCH? > >>> > >>>If you just want to pass a couple of IDs, then don't, it's a waste. > >>>But I still don't know what problem you are trying to solve, > >>>looking at guest driver did not help. > >> > >>It's not just a couple of IDs, it's also random fields of the MCH > >>configuration space. Grep drivers/gpu/drm/i915 for bridge_dev. > >> > >>Paolo > > > >I did, it seems to look for device at 0,0: > > > > static int i915_get_bridge_dev(struct drm_device *dev) > > { > > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; > > > > dev_priv->bridge_dev = pci_get_bus_and_slot(0, PCI_DEVFN(0, 0)); > > if (!dev_priv->bridge_dev) { > > DRM_ERROR("bridge device not found\n"); > > return -1; > > } > > return 0; > > } > > > >are you sure this is the ISA bridge device? these patches put it at 1f. > > > > :) The IGD is too complex to understand. > > The i915 driver needs to access that host bridge at 00:00.0, and this is > addressed in patch #3. You mean patch #4. > Also the i915 needs that ISA bridge at 00:1f.0, this is just what we're > discussing now. > > Thanks > Tiejun Yea. That vile thing seems to mostly be safe to ignore. -- MST _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |