[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH net] xen-netback: Fix slot estimation
On 03/06/14 14:52, David Laight wrote: From: netdev-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@@ -615,9 +608,27 @@ static void xenvif_rx_action(struct xenvif *vif) /* If the skb may not fit then bail out now */ if (!xenvif_rx_ring_slots_available(vif, max_slots_needed)) { + /* If the skb needs more than MAX_SKB_FRAGS slots, it + * can happen that the frontend never gives us enough. + * To avoid spining on that packet, first we put it back + * to the top of the queue, but if the next try fail, + * we drop it. + */ + if (max_slots_needed > MAX_SKB_FRAGS && + vif->rx_last_skb_slots == MAX_SKB_FRAGS) { + kfree_skb(skb); + vif->rx_last_skb_slots = 0; + continue; + }A silent discard here doesn't seem right at all. While it stops the kernel crashing, or the entire interface locking up; it is likely to leave one connection 'stuck' - a TCP retransmission is likely to include the same fragments. From a user point of view this as almost as bad. Yes, we are aware of this problem for a while. However I have an idea to solve that in a way that we don't lose performance, and these packets can pass through as well. See my patch called "Fix handling of skbs requiring too many slots" Zoli _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |