|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 7/9] xl: enable getting and setting soft
On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 01:42 +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> @@ -4653,17 +4656,32 @@ int main_vcpulist(int argc, char **argv)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int vcpupin(uint32_t domid, const char *vcpu, char *cpu)
> +int main_vcpupin(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> libxl_vcpuinfo *vcpuinfo;
> - libxl_bitmap cpumap;
> -
> - uint32_t vcpuid;
> + libxl_bitmap cpumap, cpumap_soft;;
> + uint32_t vcpuid, domid;
> + const char *vcpu;
> char *endptr;
> - int i, nb_cpu, nb_vcpu, rc = -1;
> + int opt, nb_cpu, nb_vcpu, rc = -1;
> + libxl_bitmap *soft = &cpumap_soft, *hard = &cpumap;
> + static struct option opts[] = {
> + {"soft", 0, 0, 's'},
I think this is a remnant of a previous iteration?
> + COMMON_LONG_OPTS,
> + {0, 0, 0, 0}
> + };
>
> libxl_bitmap_init(&cpumap);
> + libxl_bitmap_init(&cpumap_soft);
>
> + SWITCH_FOREACH_OPT(opt, "", opts, "vcpu-pin", 3) {
> + /* No options */
> + }
> +
> + domid = find_domain(argv[optind]);
> + vcpu = argv[optind+1];
> +
> + /* Figure out with which vCPU we are dealing with */
> vcpuid = strtoul(vcpu, &endptr, 10);
> if (vcpu == endptr) {
> if (strcmp(vcpu, "all")) {
> @@ -4673,10 +4691,27 @@ static int vcpupin(uint32_t domid, const char *vcpu,
> char *cpu)
> vcpuid = -1;
> }
>
> - if (libxl_cpu_bitmap_alloc(ctx, &cpumap, 0))
> + if (libxl_cpu_bitmap_alloc(ctx, &cpumap, 0) ||
> + (argc == 5 && libxl_cpu_bitmap_alloc(ctx, &cpumap_soft, 0)))
I think you could omit the argc==5 here, one measly allocation is all it
is saving you.
> goto out;
>
> - if (vcpupin_parse(cpu, &cpumap))
> + /*
> + * Syntax is: xl vcpu-pin <domid> <vcpu> <hard> <soft>
> + * We want to handle all the following cases ('-' means
> + * "leave it alone"):
> + * xl vcpu-pin 0 3 3,4
> + * xl vcpu-pin 0 3 3,4 -
> + * xl vcpu-pin 0 3 - 6-9
> + * xl vcpu-pin 0 3 3,4 6-9
> + */
> + if (argc <= 4 || (argc == 5 && !strcmp(argv[optind+3], "-")))
You are mixing raw argc values and offsets from optind here, which is a
bit confusing.
It would be valid to do
argc -= optind;
argv += optind;
optind = 0;
and then use argv[0] ...[1] etc.
Or just use optind+N for everything.
> + soft = NULL;
> + if (argc == 5 && !strcmp(argv[optind+2], "-"))
> + hard = NULL;
> +
> + if (hard && vcpupin_parse(argv[optind+2], &cpumap))
> + goto out;
> + if (soft && vcpupin_parse(argv[optind+3], &cpumap_soft))
> goto out;
You've just parsed argv[option+2] and [...+3] into hard and soft
respectively.
Might some of this be simplified by making vcpupin_parse accept NULL
and/or making it handle "-"? e.g.
hard = argv[opting+2]
soft = argc > XXX > argc[optind+3] : NULL
vcpupin_parse(&hard, &cpumap);
vcpupin_parse(&soft, &cpumap);
(sets hard/soft == NULL on input of "-", returns silently on hard/soft
== NULL.
> diff --git a/tools/libxl/xl_cmdtable.c b/tools/libxl/xl_cmdtable.c
> index 4279b9f..d03c52a 100644
> --- a/tools/libxl/xl_cmdtable.c
> +++ b/tools/libxl/xl_cmdtable.c
> @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ struct cmd_spec cmd_table[] = {
> { "vcpu-pin",
> &main_vcpupin, 1, 1,
> "Set which CPUs a VCPU can use",
> - "<Domain> <VCPU|all> <CPUs|all>",
> + "<Domain> <VCPU|all> <Hard affinity|all> <Soft affinity|all",
Missing a closing >
Also, I think "-" is a valid alternative now, right?
> },
> { "vcpu-set",
> &main_vcpuset, 0, 1,
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |