[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.4-testing test] 25962: regressions - FAIL
>>> On 30.04.14 at 16:34, <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.4-testing test] 25962: > regressions - > FAIL"): >> On 24.04.14 at 09:52, <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > flight 25962 xen-4.4-testing real [real] >> > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/25962/ > ... >> Interleaving the two logs I wonder whether the 7000s timeout is just >> a little too short here (which might explain why we see this kind of test >> fail not that infrequently): > > No, I don't think so. In 25996 (itch-mite, Intel X3450, 8 cores, 8G) > this test took only 2007s. It may be host-specific - 25962 was on > lake-frog (AMD 6168, 24 cores, 32G). If it's host specific, the one global timeout may still be too short on one host, and quite long enough on another. That said, a ratio of over 3:1 between two hosts where the apparently slower one is actually faster is of course quite odd. Problem is - from the logs I once again can't see what's going wrong here, and there's not that many changes pending on the 4.4 branch that one couldn't tell that with them having passed on -unstable they should pass here too. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |