Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 25949: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 10:31 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 23.04.14 at 03:08, <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > flight 25949 xen-unstable real [real]
> > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/25949/ 
> > 
> > Regressions :-(
> > 
> > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> > including tests which could not be run:
> >  test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64  3 host-install(3) broken REGR. vs. 
> > 25945

This seems to be on itch-mite:
        2014-04-22 21:21:43 Z executing ssh ... root@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
        cat /proc/partitions
        2014-04-22 21:21:43 Z | major minor  #blocks  name
        2014-04-22 21:21:43 Z | 
        2014-04-22 21:21:43 Z |   11        0    1048575 sr0
        2014-04-22 21:21:43 Z |    8        0  244140625 sda
        2014-04-22 21:21:43 Z |    8       16  244198584 sdb
        2014-04-22 21:21:43 Z executing ssh ... root@xxxxxxxxxxxxx pvcreate 
/dev/sdb
          Device /dev/sdb not found (or ignored by filtering).
        2014-04-22 21:21:44 Z command nonzero waitstatus 1280: ssh -o 
StrictHostKeyChecking=no -o BatchMode=yes -o ConnectTimeout=100 -o 
ServerAliveInterval=100 -o PasswordAuthentication=no -o 
ChallengeResponseAuthentication=no -o 
UserKnownHostsFile=tmp/t.known_hosts_25949.test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 
root@xxxxxxxxxxxxx pvcreate /dev/sdb
        status 1280 at Osstest/TestSupport.pm line 389.
        + rc=5

Very odd.

> >  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 13 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail REGR. 
> > vs. 25945

        no active lease win.guest.osstest at ./ts-guest-localmigrate line 44.

I think we see these occasionally? The screenshot shows the guest
looking OK.

> >  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64  5 xen-boot           fail REGR. vs. 
> > 25945

This was grain weevil. Looks like exim was slow to start, which might
have been DNS related, but it was only 30s, which seems like to little
to cause it to time out.

> The log appears to show that Dom0 booted up fine - were there any
> infrastructure problems (also taking into consideration the broken
> host-install above)?

Citrix IT were messing with the firewall configuration around here
yesterday, the change has been rolled back though. But I don't think the
machines which are involved here should have been affected since they
all live on the same subnet. But DNS might have been impacted for them I
guess.

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel