[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] x86/vmx: Add force-ept command line option

To: "Aravindh Puthiyaparambil" <aravindp@xxxxxxxxx>, "George Dunlap" <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 11:15:28 +0100
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>, Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx>, Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 10:15:36 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

>>> On 22.04.14 at 11:53, <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm not sure "force-ept" is quite descriptive enough; it seems like it
> would be better to mention the specific thing you're ignoring.
> "ept-unsafe-pat" perhaps?

While I suggested the current name, I'm not too happy with it either.
Otoh the way it is it would be more obviously leveragable for eventual
further overrides.

Jan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] x86/vmx: Add force-ept command line option
  - From: Aravindh Puthiyaparambil (aravindp)

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] x86/vmx: Add force-ept command line option
  - From: Aravindh Puthiyaparambil
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] x86/vmx: Add force-ept command line option
  - From: George Dunlap

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC V2 10/10] xl: introduce "xl-json" format
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC] arm64: 32-bit tolerant sync bitops
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] x86/vmx: Add force-ept command line option
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] x86/vmx: Add force-ept command line option
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.