[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v9 06/19] qspinlock: prolong the stay in the pending bit path
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 09:46:04PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > BTW, I didn't test out your atomic_test_and_set() change. Did it provide a > noticeable performance benefit when compared with cmpxchg()? I've not tested that I think. I had a hard time showing that cmpxchg loops were slower, but once I did, I simply replaced all cmpxchg loops with unconditional ops where possible. The machine that was big enough to show it lived in a lab half way around the world and using it was a right pain in the ass, so I didn't use it more than I absolutely had to. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |