[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 2/2] allow hardware domain != dom0
On 04/16/2014 03:06 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 16/04/14 19:56, Daniel De Graaf wrote:
static unsigned int __read_mostly extra_dom0_irqs = 256;
static unsigned int __read_mostly extra_domU_irqs = 32;
static void __init parse_extra_guest_irqs(const char *s)
@@ -192,7 +242,7 @@ custom_param("extra_guest_irqs", parse_extra_guest_irqs);
struct domain *domain_create(
domid_t domid, unsigned int domcr_flags, uint32_t ssidref)
{
- struct domain *d, **pd;
+ struct domain *d, **pd, *old_hwdom = NULL;
enum { INIT_xsm = 1u<<0, INIT_watchdog = 1u<<1, INIT_rangeset = 1u<<2,
INIT_evtchn = 1u<<3, INIT_gnttab = 1u<<4, INIT_arch = 1u<<5 };
int err, init_status = 0;
@@ -237,10 +287,12 @@ struct domain *domain_create(
else if ( domcr_flags & DOMCRF_pvh )
d->guest_type = guest_type_pvh;
- if ( domid == 0 )
+ if ( domid == 0 || domid == hardware_domid )
{
+ BUG_ON(domid >= DOMID_FIRST_RESERVED);
Domid is a signed type.
You also need ensure it is not negative, as assign_integer_param() from
the command line parsing writes all values as unsigned.
~Andrew
While this is true, the domain ID has already been validated by the caller
of domain_create and so there is no need to check for domid < 0 here. If
someone assigns an out-of-range domain ID to the hardware_domid field, the
system will act the same as if any other unused domain ID is specified: a
technically working but realistically unusable system.
--
Daniel De Graaf
National Security Agency
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|