[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 12/16] xen/arm: split vgic driver into generic and vgic-v2 driver
Hello Vijaya, Thank you for the patch. On 04/15/2014 12:17 PM, vijay.kilari@xxxxxxxxx wrote: [..] > +/* > + * Offset of GICD_<FOO><n> with its rank, for GICD_<FOO> with > + * <b>-bits-per-interrupt. > + */ > +#define REG_RANK_INDEX(b, n) ((n) & ((b)-1)) > + > +/* > + * Returns rank corresponding to a GICD_<FOO><n> register for > + * GICD_<FOO> with <b>-bits-per-interrupt. > + */ > +static struct vgic_irq_rank *vgic_irq_rank(struct vcpu *v, int b, int n) I think all the functions have to be named vgic_v2_... It will improve readability for backtrace. > +{ > + int rank = REG_RANK_NR(b, n); > + return vgic_get_irqrank(v, rank); > +} > + > +static int vgic_read_priority(struct vcpu *v, int irq) > +{ > + int idx = irq >> 2; > + struct vgic_irq_rank *rank = vgic_irq_rank(v, 8, idx); New line here for clarity. > + return byte_read(rank->ipriority[REG_RANK_INDEX(8, idx)], 0, irq & 0x3); > +} [..] > +static int vgic_vcpu_init(struct vcpu *v) > +{ > + int i; > + > + /* For SGI and PPI the target is always this CPU */ > + for ( i = 0 ; i < 8 ; i++ ) > + v->arch.vgic.private_irqs->itargets[i] = > + (1<<(v->vcpu_id+0)) > + | (1<<(v->vcpu_id+8)) > + | (1<<(v->vcpu_id+16)) > + | (1<<(v->vcpu_id+24)); Newline here for clarity. > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int vgic_domain_init(struct domain *d) > +{ > + vgic_distr_mmio_handler.addr = d->arch.vgic.dbase; > + vgic_distr_mmio_handler.size = PAGE_SIZE; > + register_mmio_handler(d, &vgic_distr_mmio_handler); > + return 0; > +} > + > +static struct vgic_ops ops = { This function as to be const. > + .vgic_vcpu_init = vgic_vcpu_init, > + .vgic_domain_init = vgic_domain_init, > + .read_priority = vgic_read_priority, > +}; > + > +int vgic_v2_init(struct domain *d) > +{ What domain is used for if you unconditionally register the ops? > + register_vgic_ops(&ops); I think you need to pass the domain here. And register the ops per domain. Will be easier for a later change to support V2 on V3. > + return 0; > +} > + > +/* > + * Local variables: > + * mode: C > + * c-file-style: "BSD" > + * c-basic-offset: 4 > + * indent-tabs-mode: nil > + * End: > + */ > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c > index 7e258ae..f487784 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c > @@ -28,29 +28,20 @@ > #include <asm/current.h> > > #include <asm/mmio.h> > -#include <asm/gic_v2_defs.h> > #include <asm/gic.h> > #include <asm/vgic.h> > > -#define REG(n) (n/4) > > -static struct mmio_handler vgic_distr_mmio_handler; > +static struct vgic_ops *vgic_ops; static const ? > > -/* > - * Offset of GICD_<FOO><n> with its rank, for GICD_<FOO> with > - * <b>-bits-per-interrupt. > - */ > -#define REG_RANK_INDEX(b, n) ((n) & ((b)-1)) > - > -/* > - * Returns rank corresponding to a GICD_<FOO><n> register for > - * GICD_<FOO> with <b>-bits-per-interrupt. > - */ > -static struct vgic_irq_rank *vgic_irq_rank(struct vcpu *v, int b, int n) > +void register_vgic_ops(struct vgic_ops *ops) const struct vgic_ops *ops ? > { > - int rank = REG_RANK_NR(b, n); > + vgic_ops = ops; > +} > > - if ( rank == 0 ) > +struct vgic_irq_rank *vgic_get_irqrank(struct vcpu *v, int rank) > +{ > + if ( rank == 0 ) /* Rank 0 is nothing but GICR registers in GICv3 */ > return v->arch.vgic.private_irqs; > else if ( rank <= DOMAIN_NR_RANKS(v->domain) ) > return &v->domain->arch.vgic.shared_irqs[rank - 1]; > @@ -61,7 +52,6 @@ static struct vgic_irq_rank *vgic_irq_rank(struct vcpu *v, > int b, int n) > int domain_vgic_init(struct domain *d) > { > int i; > - > d->arch.vgic.ctlr = 0; > > /* Currently nr_lines in vgic and gic doesn't have the same meanings > @@ -72,21 +62,34 @@ int domain_vgic_init(struct domain *d) > else > d->arch.vgic.nr_lines = 0; /* We don't need SPIs for the guest */ > > + if ( gic_hw_version() == GIC_V2 ) > + vgic_v2_init(d); > + else > + panic("No VGIC found\n"); panic when a domain is creating is not the right thing to do... You should return here. > + > d->arch.vgic.shared_irqs = > xzalloc_array(struct vgic_irq_rank, DOMAIN_NR_RANKS(d)); > + if ( d->arch.vgic.shared_irqs == NULL ) > + return -ENOMEM; > + Which version of Xen are you using? A patch to check shared_irqs has been upstreamed a while ago. > + for ( i = 0; i < DOMAIN_NR_RANKS(d); i++ ) > + spin_lock_init(&d->arch.vgic.shared_irqs[i].lock); > + Why did you move this code earlier? > + vgic_ops->vgic_domain_init(d); > + I think vgic_domain_init should be called at the end. Not in middle of the initialization... > d->arch.vgic.pending_irqs = > xzalloc_array(struct pending_irq, d->arch.vgic.nr_lines); > - for (i=0; i<d->arch.vgic.nr_lines; i++) > + if ( d->arch.vgic.pending_irqs == NULL ) > + { > + xfree(d->arch.vgic.shared_irqs); > + return -ENOMEM; > + } > + Patch already sent to fix this. > + for ( i = 0; i < d->arch.vgic.nr_lines; i++) for ( ... ) > { > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&d->arch.vgic.pending_irqs[i].inflight); > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&d->arch.vgic.pending_irqs[i].lr_queue); > } > - for (i=0; i<DOMAIN_NR_RANKS(d); i++) > - spin_lock_init(&d->arch.vgic.shared_irqs[i].lock); > - > - vgic_distr_mmio_handler.addr = d->arch.vgic.dbase; > - vgic_distr_mmio_handler.size = PAGE_SIZE; > - register_mmio_handler(d, &vgic_distr_mmio_handler); > return 0; > } > > @@ -105,9 +108,13 @@ int vcpu_vgic_init(struct vcpu *v) > return -ENOMEM; > > memset(v->arch.vgic.private_irqs, 0, sizeof(v->arch.vgic.private_irqs)); > - Spurious change? > spin_lock_init(&v->arch.vgic.private_irqs->lock); > > + if ( vgic_ops ) > + vgic_ops->vgic_vcpu_init(v); > + else > + panic("No VGIC ops found\n"); > + No panic here... vgic_ops has been set before. So why should you check here? Same question as for vgic_vpcu_init. Why did you move this code early? > memset(&v->arch.vgic.pending_irqs, 0, sizeof(v->arch.vgic.pending_irqs)); > for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) > { > @@ -115,13 +122,6 @@ int vcpu_vgic_init(struct vcpu *v) > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&v->arch.vgic.pending_irqs[i].lr_queue); > } > > - /* For SGI and PPI the target is always this CPU */ > - for ( i = 0 ; i < 8 ; i++ ) > - v->arch.vgic.private_irqs->itargets[i] = > - (1<<(v->vcpu_id+0)) > - | (1<<(v->vcpu_id+8)) > - | (1<<(v->vcpu_id+16)) > - | (1<<(v->vcpu_id+24)); > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&v->arch.vgic.inflight_irqs); > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&v->arch.vgic.lr_pending); > spin_lock_init(&v->arch.vgic.lock); > @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ int vcpu_vgic_free(struct vcpu *v) > return 0; > } > > -static uint32_t byte_read(uint32_t val, int sign, int offset) > +uint32_t byte_read(uint32_t val, int sign, int offset) If you export this function, please rename it. Also, I think it can be moved static inline in vgic.h. > { > int byte = offset & 0x3; > > @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ static uint32_t byte_read(uint32_t val, int sign, int > offset) > return val; > } > > -static void byte_write(uint32_t *reg, uint32_t var, int offset) > +void byte_write(uint32_t *reg, uint32_t var, int offset) Same remarks here. [..] > struct pending_irq *irq_to_pending(struct vcpu *v, unsigned int irq) > { > struct pending_irq *n; > @@ -666,10 +229,9 @@ void vgic_clear_pending_irqs(struct vcpu *v) > > void vgic_vcpu_inject_irq(struct vcpu *v, unsigned int irq) > { > - int idx = irq >> 2, byte = irq & 0x3; > uint8_t priority; > - struct vgic_irq_rank *rank = vgic_irq_rank(v, 8, idx); > - struct pending_irq *iter, *n = irq_to_pending(v, irq); > + struct pending_irq *iter; > + struct pending_irq *n = irq_to_pending(v, irq); > unsigned long flags; > bool_t running; > > @@ -682,7 +244,7 @@ void vgic_vcpu_inject_irq(struct vcpu *v, unsigned int > irq) > return; > } > > - priority = byte_read(rank->ipriority[REG_RANK_INDEX(8, idx)], 0, byte); > + priority = vgic_ops->read_priority(v, irq); > > n->irq = irq; > set_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_PENDING, &n->status); > diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/vgic.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/vgic.h > index f9d6549..187846e 100644 > --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/vgic.h > +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/vgic.h > @@ -28,6 +28,12 @@ struct vgic_irq_rank { > uint32_t itargets[8]; > }; > > +struct vgic_ops { Please describe every callbacks of this structure. > + int (*vgic_vcpu_init)(struct vcpu *v); > + int (*vgic_domain_init)(struct domain *d); > + int (*read_priority)(struct vcpu *v, int irq); I saw this function is assuming that some locks are used. Please write a comment about it. Regards, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |