[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] The segmentfault when using xl create domU
Hello, On 04/15/2014 10:45 AM, duqi wrote: > At 2014-04-15 04:53:41, "Ian Campbell" <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 10:33 +0800, duqi wrote: >>> Hi there, >>> We tried to create domU with command "xl -vvv create -d domU_01" and >>> met the below fault: >>> >>> root@linaro-alip:~/domU# xl -vvv create -d domU_01 >> >> Does this happen if you drop the "-d"? >> >> please could you run under gdb and grab a backtrace. Someth8ing like: >> # gdb --args xl -vvv create -d domU_01 >> (gdb) run >> .... >> crash! >> (gdb) bt >> > > Hi, here is the gdb output: > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > 0xb6f6bc30 in memcpy (__len=16, __src=0xbefe6e0c, __dest=0x39488) > at > /usr/lib/gcc-cross/arm-linux-gnueabihf/4.7/../../../../arm-linux-gnueabihf/include/bits/string3.h:51 > 51 > /usr/lib/gcc-cross/arm-linux-gnueabihf/4.7/../../../../arm-linux-gnueabihf/include/bits/string3.h: > No such file or direc. > (gdb) bt > #0 0xb6f6bc30 in memcpy (__len=16, __src=0xbefe6e0c, __dest=0x39488) > at > /usr/lib/gcc-cross/arm-linux-gnueabihf/4.7/../../../../arm-linux-gnueabihf/include/bits/string3.h:51 > #1 libxl_list_vm (ctx=ctx@entry=0x33030, > nb_vm_out=nb_vm_out@entry=0xbeffee30) at libxl.c:689 > #2 0xb6f7b934 in libxl__domain_make (gc=gc@entry=0x393d0, > info=info@entry=0xbefff040, domid=domid@entry=0xbeffeec0) > at libxl_create.c:613 > #3 0xb6f7cadc in initiate_domain_create (dcs=0x398a8, egc=0xbeffeec4) > at libxl_create.c:791 > #4 do_domain_create (ctx=ctx@entry=0x33030, > d_config=d_config@entry=0xbefff040, domid=domid@entry=0xbeffef80, > restore_fd=restore_fd@entry=-1, > checkpointed_stream=checkpointed_stream@entry=0, ao_how=ao_how@entry=0x0, > aop_console_how=aop_console_how@entry=0x0) at libxl_create.c:1424 > #5 0xb6f7d428 in libxl_domain_create_new (ctx=0x33030, > d_config=d_config@entry=0xbefff040, domid=domid@entry=0xbeffef80, > ao_how=ao_how@entry=0x0, aop_console_how=aop_console_how@entry=0x0) > at libxl_create.c:1449 > #6 0x00017040 in create_domain (dom_info=0xbeffefdc) at xl_cmdimpl.c:2283 > #7 main_create (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>) > at xl_cmdimpl.c:4469 > #8 0x0000db84 in main (argc=3, argv=0xbefff82c) at xl.c:362 > (gdb) It's a compiler bug. For some reasons gcc doesn't generate the right assembly when -O1 is specified on the command line. Which version of gcc do you use(4.7.*?)? Which distribution are you using? Can you also call disas the crash and copy the output? Gcc 4.8 doesn't seem to be affected. FYI, I got this output from 4.7 with Linaro Ubuntu raring (gcc 4.7.3). 0x76f71bd0 <+224>: mov r5, #0 0x76f71bd4 <+228>: mov r4, r5 0x76f71bd8 <+232>: mov r7, r5 <= r7 = r5 = 0 0x76f71bdc <+236>: sub r6, r11, #98304 ; 0x18000 0x76f71be0 <+240>: sub r6, r6, #36 ; 0x24 0x76f71be4 <+244>: mov r9, r5 0x76f71be8 <+248>: str r8, [r12, #-68] ; 0x44 0x76f71bec <+252>: sub r3, r11, #98304 ; 0x18000 0x76f71bf0 <+256>: ldr r0, [r3, #-68] ; 0x44 0x76f71bf4 <+260>: ldrh r1, [r6, r5] 0x76f71bf8 <+264>: mov r2, r9 0x76f71bfc <+268>: bl 0x76f6d6ac 0x76f71c00 <+272>: cmp r0, #0 0x76f71c04 <+276>: bne 0x76f71c50 <libxl_list_vm+352> 0x76f71c08 <+280>: add r8, r7, r7, lsl #2 <= Last time we set r8 = r7 << 2 = 0 0x76f71c0c <+284>: sub r12, r11, #98304 ; 0x18000 0x76f71c10 <+288>: str r8, [r12, #-56] ; 0x38 0x76f71c14 <+292>: ldr r3, [r12, #-60] ; 0x3c 0x76f71c18 <+296>: add lr, r3, r8, lsl #2 0x76f71c1c <+300>: add r12, r4, r4, lsl #1 0x76f71c20 <+304>: add r12, r6, r12, lsl #5 0x76f71c24 <+308>: add r12, r12, #76 ; 0x4c 0x76f71c28 <+312>: ldm r12!, {r0, r1, r2, r3} 0x76f71c2c <+316>: mov r12, r8 => 0x76f71c30 <+320>: ldr r8, [r8, #-60] ; 0x3c <= r8 (=0) is dereferenced Regards, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |