[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/6] [VERY RFC] Migration Stream v2
On 14/04/14 18:49, George Dunlap wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Andrew Cooper > <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 10/04/14 11:42, Ian Campbell wrote: >>> On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 19:28 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: >>>> Some design decisions have been take very deliberately (e.g. splitting the >>>> logic for PV and hvm migration) while others have been more along the >>>> lines of >>>> "I think its a sensible thing to do given a lack of any evidence/opinion to >>>> the contrary". >>> Is there some indication of which is which? >> >> Not really, given the clean rewrite, and also that it is only partially >> complete. >> >>> >>> Should we check in the desigh/spec which was previously posted as part >>> of this? >> >> I knew I forgot something... >> >> http://xenbits.xen.org/people/andrewcoop/domain-save-format-E.pdf > > > What did you imagine might constitute an "Optional" record? This was something Ian Jackson asked for and it seems like a useful capabilitity to have for future use. Not sure what it might be used for yet. David _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |