[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] evtchn: eliminate 64k ports limitation

To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
From: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 16:54:42 +0100
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 15:54:50 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

Jan Beulich wrote:

The introduction of FIFO event channels claimed to support over 100k
ports, but failed to widen a number of 16-bit variables/operations.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich<jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] evtchn: eliminate 64k ports limitation
  - From: Jan Beulich

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] serial: Expand the PCIe params for an Oxford two port serial cards (v2).
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] further prefetch cleanup
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] evtchn: eliminate 64k ports limitation
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V8 0/8] Remus/Libxl: Network buffering support
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.