[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 01/10] qspinlock: A generic 4-byte queue spinlock implementation
On 04/04/2014 12:57 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 03:00:12PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:So I'm just not ever going to pick up this patch; I spend a week trying to reverse engineer this; I posted a 7 patch series creating the equivalent, but in a gradual and readable fashion: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140310154236.038181843@xxxxxxxxxxxxx You keep on ignoring that; I'll keep on ignoring your patches. I might at some point rewrite some of your pv stuff on top to get this moving again, but I'm not really motivated to work with you atm.Uh? Did you CC also xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on your patches Peter? I hadn't had a chance to see or comment on them :-( Peter's patch is a rewrite of my patches 1-4, there is no PV or unfair lock support in there. -Longman _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |