[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 00/10] qspinlock: a 4-byte queue spinlock with PV support
- To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 22:57:18 -0400
- Cc: x86@xxxxxxxxxx, Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Marcos Matsunaga <Marcos.Matsunaga@xxxxxxxxxx>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Scott J Norton <scott.norton@xxxxxx>, Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@xxxxxxxxx>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@xxxxxx>, Chegu Vinod <chegu_vinod@xxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 02:58:05 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
On 04/03/2014 01:23 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 10:10:17PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
On 04/02/2014 04:35 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
On 04/02/2014 10:32 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 09:27:29AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
N.B. Sorry for the duplicate. This patch series were resent as the
original one was rejected by the vger.kernel.org list server
due to long header. There is no change in content.
v7->v8:
- Remove one unneeded atomic operation from the slowpath, thus
improving performance.
- Simplify some of the codes and add more comments.
- Test for X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR CPU feature bit to enable/disable
unfair lock.
- Reduce unfair lock slowpath lock stealing frequency depending
on its distance from the queue head.
- Add performance data for IvyBridge-EX CPU.
FYI, your v7 patch with 32 VCPUs (on a 32 cpu socket machine) on an
HVM guest under Xen after a while stops working. The workload
is doing 'make -j32' on the Linux kernel.
Completely unresponsive. Thoughts?
Thank for reporting that. I haven't done that much testing on Xen.
My focus was in KVM. I will perform more test on Xen to see if I
can reproduce the problem.
BTW, does the halting and sending IPI mechanism work in HVM? I saw
Yes.
that in RHEL7, PV spinlock was explicitly disabled when in HVM mode.
However, this piece of code isn't in upstream code. So I wonder if
there is problem with that.
The PV ticketlock fixed it for HVM. It was disabled before because
the PV guests were using bytelocks while the HVM were using ticketlocks
and you couldnt' swap in PV bytelocks for ticketlocks during startup.
The RHEL7 code has used PV ticketlock already. RHEL7 uses a single
kernel for all configurations. So PV ticketlock as well as Xen and KVM
support was compiled in. I think booting the kernel on bare metal will
cause the Xen code to work in HVM mode thus activating the PV spinlock
code which has a negative impact on performance. That may be why it was
disabled so that the bare metal performance will not be impacted.
BTW, could you send me more information about the configuration of the
machine, like the .config file that you used?
-Longman
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
