[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] grant-table, xen-netback: Introduce helper functions for grant copy operations
On 03/04/14 09:12, Paul Durrant wrote: > Zoltan Kiss wrote: >> >> Create helper functions for grant copy operations and use them in netback. >> [...] >> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c >> @@ -275,23 +275,29 @@ static void xenvif_gop_frag_copy(struct xenvif *vif, >> struct sk_buff *skb, >> bytes = MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET - npo->copy_off; >> >> copy_gop = npo->copy + npo->copy_prod++; >> - copy_gop->flags = GNTCOPY_dest_gref; >> - copy_gop->len = bytes; >> >> if (foreign_vif) { >> - copy_gop->source.domid = foreign_vif->domid; >> - copy_gop->source.u.ref = foreign_gref; >> - copy_gop->flags |= GNTCOPY_source_gref; >> + gnttab_set_copy_op_ref_to_ref(copy_gop, >> + foreign_gref, >> + npo->copy_gref, >> + foreign_vif->domid, >> + offset, >> + vif->domid, >> + npo->copy_off, >> + bytes, >> + GNTCOPY_dest_gref | >> + GNTCOPY_source_gref); > > Can't you lose the flags here (and in the other variants)? Since > they are implied by the variant of the function they could just be hardcoded > there, couldn't they? Even with that change these are still functions with 7 or 8 parameters with no obvious order. That's just awful. The open-coded struct initialization is better. David _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |