Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable bisection] complete test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 02.04.14 at 17:44, <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> xen.org writes ("[xen-unstable bisection] complete 
> test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd"):
>> branch xen-unstable
>> xen branch xen-unstable
>> job test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd
>> test redhat-install
>> 
>> Tree: linux git://xenbits.xen.org/linux-pvops.git
>> Tree: linuxfirmware git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/linux-firmware.git
>> Tree: qemu git://xenbits.xen.org/staging/qemu-xen-unstable.git
>> Tree: qemuu git://xenbits.xen.org/staging/qemu-upstream-unstable.git
>> Tree: xen git://xenbits.xen.org/xen.git
>> 
>> *** Found and reproduced problem changeset ***
>> 
>>   Bug is in tree:  xen git://xenbits.xen.org/xen.git
>>   Bug introduced:  8bad6c5626129ffba04dbab3a38115b6f3669596
>>   Bug not present: 8d134c2e12730a4a3dce9873f4671f6dd8860baf
>> 
>> 
>>   commit 8bad6c5626129ffba04dbab3a38115b6f3669596
>>   Author: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
>>   Date:   Fri Mar 28 13:31:23 2014 +0100
>>   
>>       x86/HVM: fix preemption handling in do_hvm_op()
> 
> Do you know why this might be ?

See the responses yesterday (starting at
http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-04/msg00009.html).
Fixed patch already posted earlier today.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel