|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 03/20] xenctx: Add -n (--display-stack-pages) option to output larger stack
On 04/01/14 09:25, George Dunlap wrote: On 04/01/2014 02:19 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:On Thu, 2014-03-27 at 15:05 -0400, Don Slutz wrote:
I expect so. I can flip the picture (and add relative address) to help. I was
basing
the layout to match the stack output:
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff81346898>] io_serial_out+0x18 <--
ffff880032bb1310: [<ffffffff81346f51>] serial8250_console_putchar+0x31
ffff880032bb1330: [<ffffffff813428de>] uart_console_write+0x3e
ffff880032bb1338: [<ffffffff8100bc0e>] apic_timer_interrupt+0xe
ffff880032bb1370: [<ffffffff813472ad>] serial8250_console_write+0xbd
ffff880032bb13c0: [<ffffffff8106b8f5>] __call_console_drivers+0x75
ffff880032bb13f0: [<ffffffff8106b95a>] _call_console_drivers+0x4a
ffff880032bb1410: [<ffffffff8106be6e>] release_console_sem+0x4e
ffff880032bb1450: [<ffffffff8106c628>] vprintk+0x248
ffff880032bb14f0: [<ffffffff814fd363>] printk+0x41
ffff880032bb3f20: [<ffffffff8100204c>] do_one_initcall+0x3c
ffff880032bb3f50: [<ffffffff810b0eb1>] sys_init_module+0xe1
ffff880032bb3f80: [<ffffffff8100b0f2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16
Adding (my) boxes (note not fully to scale):
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [<ffffffff81346898>] io_serial_out+0x18 <--
|
SP->| ffff880032bb1310: [<ffffffff81346f51>] serial8250_console_putchar+0x31
|
| ffff880032bb1330: [<ffffffff813428de>] uart_console_write+0x3e
|
| ffff880032bb1338: [<ffffffff8100bc0e>] apic_timer_interrupt+0xe
|
| ffff880032bb1370: [<ffffffff813472ad>] serial8250_console_write+0xbd
|
| ffff880032bb13c0: [<ffffffff8106b8f5>] __call_console_drivers+0x75
|
| ffff880032bb13f0: [<ffffffff8106b95a>] _call_console_drivers+0x4a
|
| ffff880032bb1410: [<ffffffff8106be6e>] release_console_sem+0x4e
|
| ffff880032bb1450: [<ffffffff8106c628>] vprintk+0x248
|
| ffff880032bb14f0: [<ffffffff814fd363>] printk+0x41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ffff880032bb3f20: [<ffffffff8100204c>] do_one_initcall+0x3c
|
| ffff880032bb3f50: [<ffffffff810b0eb1>] sys_init_module+0xe1
|
| ffff880032bb3f80: [<ffffffff8100b0f2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16
|
|
|
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
I drew my example to you the way I did for a reason. Sorry, I did not notice that. Also, should the other end of the *---* line from SP (the bottom in your diagram above) not be aligned to a page boundary, after all -n works in pages. I am happy to do it either way. I think of the page breaks to not be part of memory.
Will drop.
Partly it is used in the next patch's usage output:
-l <lines>, --lines <lines>
change the number of lines output for Stack. (default 5)
Can be specified as MAX. Note: Fewer lines will be output
if stack limit reached.
And it was the best term I know of to say in a few words:
The output of stack starts at the current SP and stops when the
end of N page(s) is/are reached.
-Don Slutz
-George _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |