|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools/libxl: Correctly check if libxl_get_scheduler has failed
Julien Grall writes ("[PATCH] tools/libxl: Correctly check if
libxl_get_scheduler has failed"):
> libxl_get_scheduler will return an enum, therefore checking if the value
> is negative is wrong.
Gah. enums in C are so hateful.
> - if ((sched = libxl_get_scheduler(ctx)) < 0) {
> + if ((int)(sched = libxl_get_scheduler(ctx)) < 0) {
I'm afraid this isn't the right fix. The right fix is not to use the
enum type at all. libxl_get_scheduler, and the "sched" local, should
be ints.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |