[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] xen-acpi-processor: (CX): Hypervisor error (-38) for ACPI CPU
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 08:07:59PM +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 19/03/14 20:04, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 03:44:13PM -0400, Don Slutz wrote: > >> I just noticed these messages from a 4.5-unstable build (a03984e + xenctx > >> changes): > >> > >> (XEN) Xen version 4.5-unstable (don@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) (gcc (GCC) > >> 4.7.2 20120921 (Red Hat 4.7.2-2)) debug=y Tue Mar 18 14:00:04 EDT 2014 > >> (XEN) Latest ChangeSet: Thu Dec 12 19:17:03 2013 +0000 git:a03984e > >> ... > >> Mar 19 15:31:16 dcs-xen-54 kernel: [ 92.479270] xen-acpi-processor: > >> (CX): Hypervisor error (-38) for ACPI CPU1 > >> Mar 19 15:31:16 dcs-xen-54 kernel: [ 92.479328] xen-acpi-processor: > >> (CX): Hypervisor error (-38) for ACPI CPU2 > >> Mar 19 15:31:16 dcs-xen-54 kernel: [ 92.479346] xen-acpi-processor: > >> (CX): Hypervisor error (-38) for ACPI CPU3 > >> Mar 19 15:31:16 dcs-xen-54 kernel: [ 92.479366] xen-acpi-processor: > >> (CX): Hypervisor error (-38) for ACPI CPU4 > >> Mar 19 15:31:16 dcs-xen-54 kernel: [ 92.479381] xen-acpi-processor: > >> (CX): Hypervisor error (-38) for ACPI CPU5 > >> Mar 19 15:31:16 dcs-xen-54 kernel: [ 92.479398] xen-acpi-processor: > >> (CX): Hypervisor error (-38) for ACPI CPU6 > >> Mar 19 15:31:16 dcs-xen-54 kernel: [ 92.479411] xen-acpi-processor: > >> (CX): Hypervisor error (-38) for ACPI CPU7 > >> Mar 19 15:31:16 dcs-xen-54 kernel: [ 92.479427] xen-acpi-processor: > >> (CX): Hypervisor error (-38) for ACPI CPU8 > >> > >> > >> This related to no-cpuidle that I have specified. Is this a bug or is it > >> expected? > > Does this fix it for you (inline and attached)? > > > > From 3b2c8fd5e3a8722983f93e790d609d0d5b38054b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 16:03:23 -0400 > > Subject: [PATCH] xen-acpi-processor: Don't display errors when we get > > -ENOSYS > > > > which is a perfectly legal error. This can be triggered if the > > user has booted Xen with the no-cpuidle parameter. > > > > Reported-by: Don Slutz <dslutz@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> > > An ENOSYS should imply that dom0 shouldn't try setting any further CPUs > worth of information. The return value is still returned it is just not spamming the console. > > ~Andrew > > > --- > > drivers/xen/xen-acpi-processor.c | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/xen/xen-acpi-processor.c > > b/drivers/xen/xen-acpi-processor.c > > index 82358d1..59fc190 100644 > > --- a/drivers/xen/xen-acpi-processor.c > > +++ b/drivers/xen/xen-acpi-processor.c > > @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ static int push_cxx_to_hypervisor(struct acpi_processor > > *_pr) > > pr_debug(" C%d: %s %d uS\n", > > cx->type, cx->desc, (u32)cx->latency); > > } > > - } else if (ret != -EINVAL) > > + } else if ((ret != -EINVAL) && (ret != -ENOSYS)) > > /* EINVAL means the ACPI ID is incorrect - meaning the ACPI > > * table is referencing a non-existing CPU - which can happen > > * with broken ACPI tables. */ > > @@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ static int push_pxx_to_hypervisor(struct acpi_processor > > *_pr) > > (u32) perf->states[i].power, > > (u32) perf->states[i].transition_latency); > > } > > - } else if (ret != -EINVAL) > > + } else if ((ret != -EINVAL) && (ret != -ENOSYS)) > > /* EINVAL means the ACPI ID is incorrect - meaning the ACPI > > * table is referencing a non-existing CPU - which can happen > > * with broken ACPI tables. */ > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Xen-devel mailing list > > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |