Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/3] x86/idle: update to include further package/core residency MSRs

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 18.03.14 at 17:18, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86/idle: update to include further 
> package/core residency MSRs"):
>> On Wed, 2014-03-05 at 10:37 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> > unused fields of which will remain untouched by the hypercall.
>> 
>> Are you supposed to initialise them to some known sentinal or are the
>> valid entries identified somewhere else (sorry, don't know much about
>> x86 pm).
> 
> I see Jan has answered this.  But I think the answer should be in the
> hypercall interface documentation, in the Xen public headers.
> 
> Would it be too much to ask that this hypercall be properly documented
> as part of these changes ?

I can certainly add a line saying so.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel