[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.5 7/8] xen/irq: Handle multiple action per IRQ
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Ian, > > On 03/18/2014 09:33 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-03-17 at 21:05 +0000, Julien Grall wrote: > >> For instance for the SMMU on midway, the device tree bindings is: > >> > >> smmu_sata: smmu@9,20180000 { > >> compatible = "arm,mmu-400"; > >> reg = <0x9 0x20180000 0x10000>; > >> mmu-masters = <&sata 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9>; > >> #global-interrupts = <1>; > >> interrupts = <0 114 4 0 114 4>; > >> calxeda,smmu-secure-config-access; > >> arm,smmu-isolate-devices; > >> }; > >> > >> As you can see the same interrupts is used twice: > > > > Is that actually valid in device tree? Or is this a quirk of the midway > > DT? > > Yes it's valid. The interrupts property for the SMMU is described as: > > "Interrupt list, with the first #global-irqs entries corresponding to > the global interrupts and any following entries corresponding to context > interrupts, specified in order of their indexing by the SMMU. > > For SMMUv2 implementations, there must be exactly one interrupt per > context bank. In the case of a single, combined interrupt, it must be > listed multiple times." > > On midway there is only one IRQ with is used for both context interrupt > and global interrupt. As it's the only platform on Linux with SMMU > support in the device tree, we don't know if every platform will have > the same behavior. I understand that the SMMU might reuse the same IRQ for multiple purposes. I would still handle the scenario entirely within the SMMU driver. Can't we register a single handler for each of the IRQ listed under the SMMU node and then figure out what was the notification for in the handler? _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |