[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 4/7] serial: Seperate the PCI device ids and parameters
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 12:38:54PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 04:30:44PM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote: > > >>> On 10.03.14 at 17:23, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> > > >>> wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 09:41:40AM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote: > > >> >>> On 07.03.14 at 20:01, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@xxxxxxxxxx> > > >> >>> wrote: > > >> > @@ -96,28 +100,27 @@ struct ns16550_config_mmio { > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > #ifdef HAS_PCI > > >> > +enum ns16550_config_param_nr { > > >> > > >> Perhaps better e.g. _kind or _idx rather than _nr? But in the end > > >> you don't use the enum tag anyway, so you could as well leave out > > >> the tag altogether. > > > > > > OK, will replace it with #defines. > > > > But that wasn't what I meant. > > My apologies. > > My brain parsed this statement: 'don't use the enum tag.. leave out the tag > altogether' > as the 'enum' not being useful. But you meant the '_nr'. But then of course the moment I changed it to 'ns16550_config_param' I realized why I had tacked on _nr to it. We already have the 'struct ns16550_config_param' so we get name space collision. I will go ahead and make the 'enum' as ns16550_config_param_idx as you suggested. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |