[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/hvm: assert that we we saved a sane number of MSRs.
>>> On 27.02.14 at 16:07, Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Just as a backstop measure against later changes that add MSRs to the > save function without updating the count in the init function. > > Signed-off-by: Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx> Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> > --- > xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c > index 9e85c13..ae24211 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c > @@ -1148,6 +1148,8 @@ static int hvm_save_cpu_msrs(struct domain *d, > hvm_domain_context_t *h) > if ( hvm_funcs.save_msr ) > hvm_funcs.save_msr(v, ctxt); > > + ASSERT(ctxt->count <= msr_count_max); > + > for ( i = 0; i < ctxt->count; ++i ) > ctxt->msr[i]._rsvd = 0; > > -- > 1.8.5.2 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |