[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] [RFC] xen/console: Provide timestamps as an offset since boot.
On 27/02/14 17:50, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 27/02/14 16:21, Tim Deegan wrote: >> At 14:03 +0000 on 27 Feb (1393506187), Andrew Cooper wrote: >>> Some latent bugs are emphasised by these changes. There are steps in time >>> when the TSC scale is calculated, and when the platform time is initialised >>> ... >>> >>> (XEN) [ 0.000000] Using scheduler: SMP Credit Scheduler (credit) >>> (XEN) [ 27.553075] Detected 2793.232 MHz processor. >>> (XEN) [ 27.558277] Initing memory sharing. >>> (XEN) [ 27.562502] Cannot set CPU feature mask on CPU#0 >>> (XEN) [ 27.567852] mce_intel.c:717: MCA Capability: BCAST 0 SER 0 >>> CMCI 0 firstbank 0 extended MCE MSR 18 >>> (XEN) [ 27.577687] Intel machine check reporting enabled >>> (XEN) [ 27.583147] PCI: MCFG configuration 0: base e0000000 segment >>> 0000 buses 00 - 3f >>> (XEN) [ 27.591407] PCI: MCFG area at e0000000 reserved in E820 >>> (XEN) [ 27.597369] PCI: Using MCFG for segment 0000 bus 00-3f >>> (XEN) [ 27.603238] I/O virtualisation disabled >>> (XEN) [ 27.608093] ENABLING IO-APIC IRQs >>> (XEN) [ 27.612136] -> Using new ACK method >>> (XEN) [ 27.616601] ..TIMER: vector=0xF0 apic1=0 pin1=2 apic2=-1 >>> pin2=-1 >>> (XEN) [ 0.153431] Platform timer is 14.318MHz HPET >> The patch below fixes the first step for me. I haven't been able to >> understand the exact mechanism of the second one yet. With this patch >> applied, of course, the second step is not visible -- which doesn't >> mean it's gone away. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Tim. >> >> commit d986516ce297bbcf3181225105dbc67edfa7c37e >> Author: Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx> >> Date: Thu Feb 27 16:17:02 2014 +0000 >> >> x86/time: Always count s_time from Xen boot. >> >> In the early-boot clock, before the calibration routines kick in, >> count time from Xen boot rather than from when the BSP's TSC was 0. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx> > This does indeed fix the first step, although I will continue debugging > the second without this present. > > However, as a time from boot, it would make more sense for the beginning > of __start_xen() (or even in the early asm code) to stash the TSC value > sideways. I will see how easy this is to do. > > ~Andrew And indeed, stashing the TSC in head.S result in: (XEN) [ 0.000000] IRQ limits: 24 GSI, 376 MSI/MSI-X (XEN) [ 0.000000] Using scheduler: SMP Credit Scheduler (credit) (XEN) [ 1.013174] Detected 2793.250 MHz processor. (XEN) [ 1.018377] Initing memory sharing. (XEN) [ 1.022601] Cannot set CPU feature mask on CPU#0 (XEN) [ 1.027950] mce_intel.c:717: MCA Capability: BCAST 0 SER 0 CMCI 0 firstbank 0 extended MCE MSR 18 (XEN) [ 1.037785] Intel machine check reporting enabled (XEN) [ 1.043245] PCI: MCFG configuration 0: base e0000000 segment 0000 buses 00 - 3f (XEN) [ 1.051509] PCI: MCFG area at e0000000 reserved in E820 (XEN) [ 1.057471] PCI: Using MCFG for segment 0000 bus 00-3f (XEN) [ 1.063340] I/O virtualisation disabled (XEN) [ 1.068198] ENABLING IO-APIC IRQs (XEN) [ 1.072241] -> Using new ACK method (XEN) [ 1.076706] ..TIMER: vector=0xF0 apic1=0 pin1=2 apic2=-1 pin2=-1 (XEN) [ 0.470790] Platform timer is 14.318MHz HPET (XEN) [ 0.475474] Allocated console ring of 16 KiB. Which is a rather more accurate time-since-boot, until the the platform timer starts up and steps time backwards. ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |