|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V3] mcheck, vmce: Allow vmce_amd_* functions to handle AMD thresolding MSRs
Aravind Gopalakrishnan wrote:
> vmce_amd_[rd|wr]msr functions can handle accesses to AMD thresholding
> registers. But due to this statement here:
> switch ( msr & (MSR_IA32_MC0_CTL | 3) )
> we are wrongly masking off top two bits which meant the register
> accesses never made it to vmce_amd_* functions.
>
> Corrected this problem by modifying the mask in this patch to allow
> AMD thresholding registers to fall to 'default' case which in turn
> allows vmce_amd_* functions to handle access to the registers.
>
> While at it, remove some clutter in the vmce_amd* functions. Retained
> current policy of returning zero for reads and ignoring writes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <aravind.gopalakrishnan@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/amd_f10.c | 41
> ++++++------------------------------- xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/vmce.c
> | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/amd_f10.c
> b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/amd_f10.c
> index 61319dc..03797ab 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/amd_f10.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/amd_f10.c
> @@ -105,43 +105,14 @@ enum mcheck_type amd_f10_mcheck_init(struct
> cpuinfo_x86 *c) /* amd specific MCA MSR */
> int vmce_amd_wrmsr(struct vcpu *v, uint32_t msr, uint64_t val)
> {
> - switch (msr) {
> - case MSR_F10_MC4_MISC1: /* DRAM error type */
> - v->arch.vmce.bank[1].mci_misc = val;
> - mce_printk(MCE_VERBOSE, "MCE: wr msr %#"PRIx64"\n", val);
> - break;
> - case MSR_F10_MC4_MISC2: /* Link error type */
> - case MSR_F10_MC4_MISC3: /* L3 cache error type */
> - /* ignore write: we do not emulate link and l3 cache errors
> - * to the guest.
> - */
> - mce_printk(MCE_VERBOSE, "MCE: wr msr %#"PRIx64"\n", val);
> - break;
> - default:
> - return 0;
> - }
> -
> - return 1;
> + /* Do nothing as we don't emulate this MC bank currently */
> + mce_printk(MCE_VERBOSE, "MCE: wr msr %#"PRIx64"\n", val);
> + return 1;
> }
>
> int vmce_amd_rdmsr(const struct vcpu *v, uint32_t msr, uint64_t *val)
> {
> - switch (msr) {
> - case MSR_F10_MC4_MISC1: /* DRAM error type */
> - *val = v->arch.vmce.bank[1].mci_misc;
> - mce_printk(MCE_VERBOSE, "MCE: rd msr %#"PRIx64"\n", *val);
> - break;
> - case MSR_F10_MC4_MISC2: /* Link error type */
> - case MSR_F10_MC4_MISC3: /* L3 cache error type */
> - /* we do not emulate link and l3 cache
> - * errors to the guest.
> - */
> - *val = 0;
> - mce_printk(MCE_VERBOSE, "MCE: rd msr %#"PRIx64"\n", *val);
> - break;
> - default:
> - return 0;
> - }
> -
> - return 1;
> + /* Assign '0' as we don't emulate this MC bank currently */
> + *val = 0;
> + return 1;
> }
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/vmce.c
> b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/vmce.c
> index f6c35db..be9bb5e 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/vmce.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/vmce.c
> @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static int bank_mce_rdmsr(const struct vcpu *v,
> uint32_t msr, uint64_t *val)
>
> *val = 0;
>
> - switch ( msr & (MSR_IA32_MC0_CTL | 3) )
> + switch ( msr & (-MSR_IA32_MC0_CTL | 3) )
Please add comments for '-MSR_IA32_MC0_CTL' where 1 mask works for all cases,
so that later reader know the history:
Intel: MCi_CTL/STATUS/ADDR/MISC 0x400~0x403
MCi_CTL2 0x280 ...
AMD: MCi_CTL/STATUS/ADDR/MISC 0x400~0x403
MCi_MISCj 0xC0000_040x
Thanks,
Jinsong
> {
> case MSR_IA32_MC0_CTL:
> /* stick all 1's to MCi_CTL */
> @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ static int bank_mce_wrmsr(struct vcpu *v,
> uint32_t msr, uint64_t val) int ret = 1;
> unsigned int bank = (msr - MSR_IA32_MC0_CTL) / 4;
>
> - switch ( msr & (MSR_IA32_MC0_CTL | 3) )
> + switch ( msr & (-MSR_IA32_MC0_CTL | 3) )
> {
> case MSR_IA32_MC0_CTL:
> /*
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |