[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V3] mcheck, vmce: Allow vmce_amd_* functions to handle AMD thresolding MSRs
Aravind Gopalakrishnan wrote: > vmce_amd_[rd|wr]msr functions can handle accesses to AMD thresholding > registers. But due to this statement here: > switch ( msr & (MSR_IA32_MC0_CTL | 3) ) > we are wrongly masking off top two bits which meant the register > accesses never made it to vmce_amd_* functions. > > Corrected this problem by modifying the mask in this patch to allow > AMD thresholding registers to fall to 'default' case which in turn > allows vmce_amd_* functions to handle access to the registers. > > While at it, remove some clutter in the vmce_amd* functions. Retained > current policy of returning zero for reads and ignoring writes. > > Signed-off-by: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <aravind.gopalakrishnan@xxxxxxx> > --- > xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/amd_f10.c | 41 > ++++++------------------------------- xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/vmce.c > | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/amd_f10.c > b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/amd_f10.c > index 61319dc..03797ab 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/amd_f10.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/amd_f10.c > @@ -105,43 +105,14 @@ enum mcheck_type amd_f10_mcheck_init(struct > cpuinfo_x86 *c) /* amd specific MCA MSR */ > int vmce_amd_wrmsr(struct vcpu *v, uint32_t msr, uint64_t val) > { > - switch (msr) { > - case MSR_F10_MC4_MISC1: /* DRAM error type */ > - v->arch.vmce.bank[1].mci_misc = val; > - mce_printk(MCE_VERBOSE, "MCE: wr msr %#"PRIx64"\n", val); > - break; > - case MSR_F10_MC4_MISC2: /* Link error type */ > - case MSR_F10_MC4_MISC3: /* L3 cache error type */ > - /* ignore write: we do not emulate link and l3 cache errors > - * to the guest. > - */ > - mce_printk(MCE_VERBOSE, "MCE: wr msr %#"PRIx64"\n", val); > - break; > - default: > - return 0; > - } > - > - return 1; > + /* Do nothing as we don't emulate this MC bank currently */ > + mce_printk(MCE_VERBOSE, "MCE: wr msr %#"PRIx64"\n", val); > + return 1; > } > > int vmce_amd_rdmsr(const struct vcpu *v, uint32_t msr, uint64_t *val) > { > - switch (msr) { > - case MSR_F10_MC4_MISC1: /* DRAM error type */ > - *val = v->arch.vmce.bank[1].mci_misc; > - mce_printk(MCE_VERBOSE, "MCE: rd msr %#"PRIx64"\n", *val); > - break; > - case MSR_F10_MC4_MISC2: /* Link error type */ > - case MSR_F10_MC4_MISC3: /* L3 cache error type */ > - /* we do not emulate link and l3 cache > - * errors to the guest. > - */ > - *val = 0; > - mce_printk(MCE_VERBOSE, "MCE: rd msr %#"PRIx64"\n", *val); > - break; > - default: > - return 0; > - } > - > - return 1; > + /* Assign '0' as we don't emulate this MC bank currently */ > + *val = 0; > + return 1; > } > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/vmce.c > b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/vmce.c > index f6c35db..be9bb5e 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/vmce.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/vmce.c > @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static int bank_mce_rdmsr(const struct vcpu *v, > uint32_t msr, uint64_t *val) > > *val = 0; > > - switch ( msr & (MSR_IA32_MC0_CTL | 3) ) > + switch ( msr & (-MSR_IA32_MC0_CTL | 3) ) Please add comments for '-MSR_IA32_MC0_CTL' where 1 mask works for all cases, so that later reader know the history: Intel: MCi_CTL/STATUS/ADDR/MISC 0x400~0x403 MCi_CTL2 0x280 ... AMD: MCi_CTL/STATUS/ADDR/MISC 0x400~0x403 MCi_MISCj 0xC0000_040x Thanks, Jinsong > { > case MSR_IA32_MC0_CTL: > /* stick all 1's to MCi_CTL */ > @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ static int bank_mce_wrmsr(struct vcpu *v, > uint32_t msr, uint64_t val) int ret = 1; > unsigned int bank = (msr - MSR_IA32_MC0_CTL) / 4; > > - switch ( msr & (MSR_IA32_MC0_CTL | 3) ) > + switch ( msr & (-MSR_IA32_MC0_CTL | 3) ) > { > case MSR_IA32_MC0_CTL: > /* _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |