[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] pvh: Fix regression caused by assumption that HVM paths MUST use io-backend device.
>>> On 13.02.14 at 17:08, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 02/13/2014 04:03 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 13.02.14 at 16:38, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Konrad / Jan: Ping?
>>>
>>> If this fix looks reasonable it would be nice to get this in before RC4.
>> It would have long been committed if the VMX maintainers finally
>> gave their okay. Even privately pinging them didn't seem to help...
>
> Oh, right, I forgot that Yang isn't a maintainer.
>
> Well it looks like we have two options:
> * Commit it without a maintainer's ack
Just committed it on the basis that I too can ack this. I would just
have preferred for the more specific maintainers to have given
their input/okay...
Jan
> * Revert the patch that caused the regression to PVH.
>
> (Or maybe Yang can chase the maintainers internally.)
>
> -George
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
