Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xl: suppress suspend/resume functions on platforms which do not support it.

[George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 02/12/2014 03:57 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 16:21 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 12, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >
> > >   #define LIBXL_HAVE_SIGCHLD_SHARING 1
> > >   
> > > +/*
> > > + * LIBXL_HAVE_NO_SUSPEND_RESUME
> > Think positive?
> > Make that HAVE_FEATURE and define it on x86.
> Could do -- anyone got any strong feeling one way or the other?
I'm a fan of consistency, so "HAVE_SUSPEND" sounds a little bit better 
to me.  But either way is fine.
 -George

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel