Re: [Xen-devel] [GIT PULL] (xen) stable/for-jens-3.14 : NFO: trying to register non-static key. the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.

[Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 11/02/14 18:52, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 11/02/14 17:40, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> On 11/02/14 17:07, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>>>
>>> Tuesday, February 11, 2014, 4:56:50 PM, you wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 04:52:15PM +0100, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>>>>> Hi Konrad,
>>>>>
>>>>> Today decided to tryout another kernel RC and your pull request to Jens 
>>>>> on top of it .. and I encoutered this one:
>>>
>>>> Thank you for testing!
>>>
>>>> Could you provide the .config file please?
>>>
>>> Attached
>>>
>>>> Did you see this _before_ the pull request with Jens? I presume
>>>> not, but just double checking?
>>>
>>> Nope not too my knowledge (though it's a bit messy with things broken on 
>>> 3.14 at the moment)
>>>
>>>> And lastly - what were you doing when you triggered this? Just launching
>>>> a guest?
>>>
>>> Nope it triggers on guest shutdown ..
>>>
>>>
>>>> CC-ing Roger and other folks who were on the patches.
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [  438.029756] INFO: trying to register non-static key.
>>>>> [  438.029759] the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
>>>>> [  438.029760] turning off the locking correctness validator.
>>>>> [  438.029770] CPU: 3 PID: 9593 Comm: blkback.2.xvda Tainted: G        W  
>>>>>   3.14.0-rc2-20140211-pcireset-net-btrevert-xenblock+ #1
>>>>> [  438.029773] Hardware name: MSI MS-7640/890FXA-GD70 (MS-7640)  , BIOS 
>>>>> V1.8B1 09/13/2010
>>>>> [  438.029784]  ffff88005224c4f0 ffff88004e5d9b68 ffffffff81b808c4 
>>>>> ffff88004ba2b510
>>>>> [  438.029791]  0000000000000002 ffff88004e5d9c38 ffffffff81116eab 
>>>>> ffff88004e5d9bf8
>>>>> [  438.029798]  ffffffff81117b35 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 
>>>>> ffffffff82cee570
>>>>> [  438.029799] Call Trace:
>>>>> [  438.029815]  [<ffffffff81b808c4>] dump_stack+0x46/0x58
>>>>> [  438.029826]  [<ffffffff81116eab>] __lock_acquire+0x1c2b/0x2220
>>>>> [  438.029833]  [<ffffffff81117b35>] ? lock_acquire+0xe5/0x150
>>>>> [  438.029841]  [<ffffffff81117b0d>] lock_acquire+0xbd/0x150
>>>>> [  438.029847]  [<ffffffff810e5965>] ? flush_work+0x5/0x290
>>>>> [  438.029852]  [<ffffffff810e599d>] flush_work+0x3d/0x290
>>>>> [  438.029856]  [<ffffffff810e5965>] ? flush_work+0x5/0x290
>>>>> [  438.029863]  [<ffffffff81117b35>] ? lock_acquire+0xe5/0x150
>>>>> [  438.029872]  [<ffffffff816fef01>] ? xen_blkif_schedule+0x1a1/0x8d0
>>>>> [  438.029881]  [<ffffffff81b8ae0d>] ? 
>>>>> _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x6d/0x90
>>>>> [  438.029888]  [<ffffffff8111392b>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xfb/0x240
>>>>> [  438.029894]  [<ffffffff81113a7d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
>>>>> [  438.029901]  [<ffffffff816fefe9>] xen_blkif_schedule+0x289/0x8d0
>>>>> [  438.029907]  [<ffffffff8110d510>] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x60/0x60
>>>>> [  438.029913]  [<ffffffff81113a7d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
>>>>> [  438.029919]  [<ffffffff81b8ae21>] ? 
>>>>> _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x81/0x90
>>>>> [  438.029925]  [<ffffffff816fed60>] ? xen_blkif_be_int+0x40/0x40
>>>>> [  438.029932]  [<ffffffff810ee374>] kthread+0xe4/0x100
>>>>> [  438.029938]  [<ffffffff81b8afe0>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x30/0x50
>>>>> [  438.029946]  [<ffffffff810ee290>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70
>>>>> [  438.029951]  [<ffffffff81b8c1fc>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
>>>>> [  438.029958]  [<ffffffff810ee290>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70
>>>>>
>>>>> Doesn't seem to serious .. but never the less :-)
>>
>> Thanks for the report!
>>
>> Does the following patch solve the problem?
>>
>> ---
>> commit c1460953d081c8a18ac9e84fe90f696cdceae105
>> Author: Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date:   Tue Feb 11 17:21:19 2014 +0100
>>
>>     xen-blkback: init persistent_purge_work work_struct
>>     
>>     Do a dummy initialization of the persistent_purge_work
>>     work_struct on xen_blkif_alloc, so that when flush_work is called on
>>     shutdown the struct is initialized even if it hasn't been used.
>>     
>>     Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c 
>> b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c
>> index 84973c6..3df7575 100644
>> --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c
>> +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c
>> @@ -129,6 +129,17 @@ static struct xen_blkif *xen_blkif_alloc(domid_t domid)
>>      blkif->free_pages_num = 0;
>>      atomic_set(&blkif->persistent_gnt_in_use, 0);
>>      atomic_set(&blkif->inflight, 0);
>> +    /*
>> +     * Init the work struct with a NULL function, this is done
>> +     * so that flush_work doesn't complain when shutting down if
>> +     * persistent_purge_work has not been used during the lifetime
>> +     * of this blkback instance.
>> +     *
>> +     * NB: In purge_persistent_gnt we make sure that
>> +     * persistent_purge_work is always correctly setup with a valid
>> +     * function pointer before being scheduled.
>> +     */
>> +    INIT_WORK(&blkif->persistent_purge_work, NULL);
> 
> I think you should init this fully here and remove the other call to
> INIT_WORK.

That would mean that unmap_purged_grants would no longer be static and 
I should also add a prototype for it in blkback/common.h, which is kind 
of ugly IMHO.

---
commit 980e72e45454b64ccb7f23b6794a769384e51038
Author: Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Tue Feb 11 19:04:06 2014 +0100

    xen-blkback: init persistent_purge_work work_struct
    
    Initialize persistent_purge_work work_struct on xen_blkif_alloc (and
    remove the previous initialization done in purge_persistent_gnt). This
    prevents flush_work from complaining even if purge_persistent_gnt has
    not been used.
    
    Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c 
b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c
index e612627..10cd50b 100644
--- a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c
+++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ static void free_persistent_gnts(struct xen_blkif *blkif, 
struct rb_root *root,
        BUG_ON(num != 0);
 }
 
-static void unmap_purged_grants(struct work_struct *work)
+void xen_blkbk_unmap_purged_grants(struct work_struct *work)
 {
        struct gnttab_unmap_grant_ref unmap[BLKIF_MAX_SEGMENTS_PER_REQUEST];
        struct page *pages[BLKIF_MAX_SEGMENTS_PER_REQUEST];
@@ -420,7 +420,6 @@ finished:
        blkif->vbd.overflow_max_grants = 0;
 
        /* We can defer this work */
-       INIT_WORK(&blkif->persistent_purge_work, unmap_purged_grants);
        schedule_work(&blkif->persistent_purge_work);
        pr_debug(DRV_PFX "Purged %u/%u\n", (total - num_clean), total);
        return;
diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/common.h 
b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/common.h
index 9eb34e2..be05277 100644
--- a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/common.h
+++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/common.h
@@ -385,6 +385,7 @@ int xen_blkbk_flush_diskcache(struct xenbus_transaction xbt,
 int xen_blkbk_barrier(struct xenbus_transaction xbt,
                      struct backend_info *be, int state);
 struct xenbus_device *xen_blkbk_xenbus(struct backend_info *be);
+void xen_blkbk_unmap_purged_grants(struct work_struct *work);
 
 static inline void blkif_get_x86_32_req(struct blkif_request *dst,
                                        struct blkif_x86_32_request *src)
diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c 
b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c
index 84973c6..9a547e6 100644
--- a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c
+++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c
@@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ static struct xen_blkif *xen_blkif_alloc(domid_t domid)
        blkif->free_pages_num = 0;
        atomic_set(&blkif->persistent_gnt_in_use, 0);
        atomic_set(&blkif->inflight, 0);
+       INIT_WORK(&blkif->persistent_purge_work, xen_blkbk_unmap_purged_grants);
 
        INIT_LIST_HEAD(&blkif->pending_free);
 



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel