[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH-4.5 3/4] xen/arm: do not request maintenance_interrupts
Hi Stefano,
On 07/02/14 18:56, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Do not set GICH_LR_MAINTENANCE_IRQ for every interrupt with set in the
GICH_LR registers.
Introduce a new function, gic_clear_lrs, that goes over the GICH_LR
registers, clear the invalid ones and free the corresponding interrupts
from the inflight queue if appropriate. Add the interrupt to lr_pending
if the GIC_IRQ_GUEST_PENDING is still set.
Call gic_clear_lrs from gic_restore_state and on return to guest
(gic_inject).
Remove the now unused code in maintenance_interrupts and gic_irq_eoi.
In vgic_vcpu_inject_irq, if the target is a vcpu running on another cpu,
send and SGI to it to interrupt it and force it to clear the old LRs.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
xen/arch/arm/gic.c | 126 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
xen/arch/arm/vgic.c | 3 +-
2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
index 215b679..87bd5d3 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
+static void gic_clear_lrs(struct vcpu *v)
+{
+ struct pending_irq *p;
+ int i = 0, irq;
+ uint32_t lr;
+ bool_t inflight;
+
+ ASSERT(!local_irq_is_enabled());
+
+ while ((i = find_next_bit((const long unsigned int *) &this_cpu(lr_mask),
+ nr_lrs, i)) < nr_lrs) {
+ lr = GICH[GICH_LR + i];
+ if ( !(lr & (GICH_LR_PENDING|GICH_LR_ACTIVE)) )
+ {
+ if ( lr & GICH_LR_HW )
+ irq = (lr >> GICH_LR_PHYSICAL_SHIFT) & GICH_LR_PHYSICAL_MASK;
+ else
+ irq = (lr >> GICH_LR_VIRTUAL_SHIFT) & GICH_LR_VIRTUAL_MASK;
+
The if sentence can be simply by:
irq = (lr >> GICH_LR_VIRTUAL_SHIFT) & GICH_LR_VIRTUAL_MASK;
+ inflight = 0;
+ GICH[GICH_LR + i] = 0;
+ clear_bit(i, &this_cpu(lr_mask));
+
+ spin_lock(&gic.lock);
+ p = irq_to_pending(v, irq);
+ if ( p->desc != NULL )
+ p->desc->status &= ~IRQ_INPROGRESS;
+ clear_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_VISIBLE, &p->status);
+ if ( test_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_PENDING, &p->status) &&
+ test_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_ENABLED, &p->status))
+ {
I would add a WARN_ON(p->desc != NULL) here. AFAIK, this code path
shouldn't be used for physical IRQ.
--
Julien Grall
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|