[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V2] x86/AMD: Apply workaround for AMD F16h Erratum792
On 2/6/2014 4:24 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: On 05.02.14 at 22:43, Aravind Gopalakrishnan <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@xxxxxxx> wrote:+ rdmsrl(MSR_AMD64_LS_CFG, value); if (!(value & (1 << 15))) { static bool_t warned;The patch context even shows what is missing: A diagnostic message making it possible to know that the workaround was applied. Of course you don't need two separate messages for the two parts of the workaround, but indicating in the message which of them was applied would seem desirable. Furthermore, I don't see why you would need a new local variable here at all - there are two suitable variables available throughout the entire function (l and h). Okay, corrected the patch as per your comments. Sending it out as V3. -Aravind _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |