[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Xen 4.4-rc3 regression with PVH compared to Xen 4.4-rc2.
On Mon, 3 Feb 2014 11:26:05 -0800 Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 3 Feb 2014 12:03:20 -0500 > Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I am hereby requesting an Xen 4.4 exemption for this bug-fix. > > > > The PVH feature is considered experimental, but it would be good to > > have it working out of the box without crashing the hypervisor. > > > > Sadly that is not the case as > > 09bb434748af9bfe3f7fca4b6eef721a7d5042a4 "Nested VMX: prohibit > > virtual vmentry/vmexit during IO emulation" casues an NULL pointer > > dereference when starting a guest with 'pvh=1' in the guest config. > > > > There are two ways of fixing this: > > a). Add an '!xen_pvh_domain()' or '!xen_pvh_vcpu(current)' in the > > path, or b). Check for ioreq() being NULL. This is actually done in > > other places in the hypervisor - so I choose to piggyback on that. > > > > I was about to send this patch on friday: > > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.c > index d2ba435..563b02f 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.c > @@ -1394,13 +1394,14 @@ void nvmx_switch_guest(void) > struct vcpu *v = current; > struct nestedvcpu *nvcpu = &vcpu_nestedhvm(v); > struct cpu_user_regs *regs = guest_cpu_user_regs(); > + ioreq_t *ioreq = get_ioreq(v); > > /* > * a pending IO emualtion may still no finished. In this case, > * no virtual vmswith is allowed. Or else, the following IO > * emulation will handled in a wrong VCPU context. > */ > - if ( get_ioreq(v)->state != STATE_IOREQ_NONE ) > + if ( ioreq && ioreq->state != STATE_IOREQ_NONE ) > return; > /* > * a softirq may interrupt us between a virtual vmentry is > > > > when I realized even after the above fix it is still crashing for > me... debugging right now. JFYI. Ok, the crash in nvmx_switch_guest() even after the above fix is a different issue for which I am making a patch. So, this patch should be applied, however, rather than calling get_ioreq() twice as in Konrad's patch, I recommend my code above which calls it once. It's inlined now, and prob would be optimized, but the function could change in many ways in future. thanks mukesh _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |