Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/12] libxl: fork: SIGCHLD flexibility

[Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@xxxxxxxx>]

Ian Jackson wrote:
> Jim Fehlig writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/12] libxl: fork: SIGCHLD 
> flexibility"):
>   
>> It appears the timeout_modify callback is invoked on a previously
>> deregistered timeout.  I didn't notice the segfault when running
>> libvirtd under valgrind, but did see
>>     
>
> Hmmm.  This could be a libxl problem.  I'll review the code again and
> maybe think about adding some assertions.
>
> But I've slept on this and I had an idea about libvirt's rescheduling
> timeouts.  Can you point me at the libvirt branch you're using (a git
> tree would be ideal) and I'll take a look at that too ?
>   

Sure

git@xxxxxxxxxx:jfehlig/libvirt.git

I just pushed that from the test machine, which has the 3 commits I'm
testing plopped on the master branch

Regards,
Jim

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel