Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.1 + Linux compiled with PVH == BOOM

["Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> 12/21/13 12:10 PM >>>
>On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 12:57 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> But perhaps that is not the way to do it and we should just cherry-pick
>> 30832c06a8d1f9caff0987654ef9e24d59469d9a in Xen 4.1?
>
>I think we should do both, i.e. backport 30832c06a8d1 now to solve the
>immediate problem and then look at fixing unstable to be more accepting
>of new features which it doesn't yet know about.

Hmm, not sure - without a split between necessary to be understood
and acceptable to be unknown ones, I'm not sure either model will be
the right thing.

>Ultimately perhaps we'd want to backport that patch too.

But not to 4.1, which is only getting security fixes backported.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel