Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH 2/3] libxl: ocaml: use int64 for timeval fields in
the timeout_register callback"):
On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 18:32 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
I now think this is fine.
Sorry for not following along properly -- do you mean the original patch
is fine or that one of the other schemes discussed in this thread is
going to be OK once implemented?
I mean that I approve of the plan to use two int64's as in Rob's
proposal.