[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH] PVH: cleanup of p2m upon p2m destroy
At 13:58 +0000 on 20 Dec (1387544306), George Dunlap wrote: > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > At 18:44 -0800 on 17 Dec (1387302252), Mukesh Rathor wrote: > >> nested ept is not supported on pvh. > > > > What, never? Or as a 'fimxe' for later? We should avoid painting > > ourselves into any more corners here if we can. > > I think most uses of nested virt would want a fully virtualized > environment to run on, wouldn't they? If, as I hope, we eventually make PVH a special case of HVM with fewer emulated devices, that line will be blurred. And maybe a PVH guest would want to run KVM or VirtualBox? Tim. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |