Re: [Xen-devel] [libvirt] Setting devid for emulated NICs (Xen 4.3.1 / libvirt 1.2.0) using libxl driver

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 2013-12-18 at 17:44 -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> Stefan Bader wrote:
> > On 18.12.2013 14:28, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >   
> >> On Wed, 2013-12-18 at 14:12 +0100, Stefan Bader wrote:
> >>     
> >>> On 18.12.2013 13:27, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >>>       
> >>>> On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 18:32 +0100, Stefan Bader wrote:
> >>>>         
> >>>>>> Might this libxl fix be relevant:
> >>>>>>         commit 5420f26507fc5c9853eb1076401a8658d72669da
> >>>>>>         Author: Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@xxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>>         Date:   Fri Jan 11 12:22:26 2013 +0000
> >>>>>>         
> >>>>>>             libxl: Set vfb and vkb devid if not done so by the caller
> >>>>>>             
> >>>>>>             Other devices set a sensible devid if the caller has not 
> >>>>>> done so.
> >>>>>>             Do the same for vfb and vkb.  While at it, factor out the 
> >>>>>> common code
> >>>>>>             used to determine a sensible devid, so it can be used by 
> >>>>>> other
> >>>>>>             libxl__device_*_add functions.
> >>>>>>             
> >>>>>>             Signed-off-by: Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@xxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>>             Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>>             Committed-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>>         
> >>>>>> and a follow up in dfeccbeaa. Although the comment implies that nic's
> >>>>>> were already correctly assigning a devid if the caller specified -1, so
> >>>>>> I don't know why it doesn't work for you :-(
> >>>>>>             
> >>>>> Ok, yes, the commit above indeed changes libxl__device_nic_add to call
> >>>>> libxl__device_nextid for the devid... Just how is this actually called.
> >>>>> Maybe not sufficient but "git grep libxl__device_nic_add" in the xen 
> >>>>> code only
> >>>>> shows the definition and a declaration in libxl_internal.h to me...
> >>>>>           
> >>>> I have a feeling a macro might be involved...
> >>>>
> >>>> Here we go, look for DEFINE_DEVICE_REMOVE in libxl.c. We should really
> >>>> add the eventual function names in comments to provide grep fodder....
> >>>>         
> >>> Oh duh, yeah. So in DEFINE_DEVICE_ADD a libxl_device_nic_add is created 
> >>> which
> >>> calls to libxl__device_nic_add. When I look for the single _ version I 
> >>> find a
> >>> call from xl_cmdimpl.c and its public declaration in libxl.h.
> >>> So I guess the bug is that libvirt in the libxl driver never seems to do 
> >>> so
> >>>       
> >> The macro creates libxl__add_nics which adds the nics from the
> >> libxl_domain_config->nics array. I don't think libvirt needs to call
> >> libxl_device_nic_add manually unless it is hotplugging a new nic at
> >> runtime.
> >>
> >>     
> >
> > Hm, so I think this is the path:
> >
> > libxl_domain_create_new
> > -> do_domain_create
> >    -> initiate_domain_create
> >       -> libxl__bootloader_run (HVM domain, skipping bootloader)
> >       <- domcreate_bootloader_done
> >          -> domcreate_rebuild_done
> >             <- domcreate_launch_dm
> >                -> libxl__spawn_local_dm
> >          <- domcreate_devmodel_started
> >
> > In libxl__spawn_local_dm, there is the following loop:
> >
> >     for (i = 0; i < d_config->num_nics; i++) {
> >         /* We have to init the nic here, because we still haven't
> >          * called libxl_device_nic_add at this point, but qemu needs
> >          * the nic information to be complete.
> >          */
> >         ret = libxl__device_nic_setdefault(gc, &d_config->nics[i], domid);
> >         if (ret)
> >             goto error_out;
> >     }
> >
> > So I think when starting the dm, the devid just is not set as setdefault 
> > does
> > not seem to do so. I would be done in the later domcreate_devmodel_started
> > callback but that is too late for the generated qemu arguments.
> >   
> 
> Sorry for jumping in late...
> 
> I stumbled across this problem just before openSUSE13.1 released and did
> a quick fix in libvirt
> 
> https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/Virtualization:openSUSE13.1/libvirt/libxl-hvm-nic.patch?expand=1
> 
> I removed setting the NIC devid in the libxl driver a while back to be
> consistent with other devices
> 
> http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=commit;h=ba64b97134a6129a48684f22f31be92c3b6eef96
> 
> The quick fix was to essentially revert the above commit until I could
> investigate further.  Thank you for now having done that investigation
> :).  Can the devid assignment logic be moved from
> libxl__device_nic_add() to libxl__device_nic_setdefault()?

It certainly seems like it would be more natural to do it there.

I suspect it might be done this way because at setdefault time you might
be walking a list of nics none of which have been created yet -- so
looking in xenstore would return "devid zero is free" for every one of
them?

How about we:
      * move the init to setdefault to catch the single NIC added via
        hotplug case
      * we add somewhere early in the domain create path a call to a
        function which assigns devids to an entire array of devices (and
        do it for all the different device types). Perhaps in
        initiate_domain_create() after the calls to
        libxl__domain_create_info_setdefault and
        libxl__domain_build_info_setdefault but before the loop calling
        libxl__device_disk_setdefault for the disks.
      * perhaps that same function should call setdefault too, after
        having assigned the device, rather than it being done later in
        an adhoc way?

Does that sound at all plausible?

Ian.



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel