[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5] xen/arm: Allow balooning working with 1:1 memory mapping
>>> On 16.12.13 at 18:00, Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > With the lack of iommu, dom0 must have a 1:1 memory mapping for all > these guest physical address. When the ballon decides to give back a > page to the kernel, this page must have the same address as previously. > Otherwise, we will loose the 1:1 mapping and will break DMA-capable > devices. > > Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> if you do one more change (and a little bit of further cleanup - sorry I didn't notice this before): > @@ -122,7 +126,29 @@ static void populate_physmap(struct memop_args *a) > } > else > { > - page = alloc_domheap_pages(d, a->extent_order, a->memflags); > + if ( is_domain_direct_mapped(d) ) > + { > + mfn = gpfn; > + if ( !mfn_valid(mfn) ) > + { > + gdprintk(XENLOG_INFO, "Invalid mfn 0x%"PRI_xen_pfn"\n", "... %#"PRI_xen_pfn"\n" please. > + mfn); > + goto out; > + } > + > + page = mfn_to_page(mfn); > + if ( !get_page(page, d) ) > + { > + gdprintk(XENLOG_INFO, > + "mfn 0x%"PRI_xen_pfn" doesn't belong to the" > + " domain\n", mfn); Same here. > --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h > +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h > @@ -86,6 +86,9 @@ enum domain_type { > #define is_pv64_domain(d) (0) > #endif > > +extern int dom0_11_mapping; > +#define is_domain_direct_mapped(d) (dom0_11_mapping && (d) == dom0) This needs to be #define is_domain_direct_mapped(d) ((d) == dom0 && dom0_11_mapping) in order to make sure d is evaluated exactly once. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |