[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 03/10] Add cpuid_vmware_leaves
>>> On 12.12.13 at 23:27, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 12/12/2013 19:15, Don Slutz wrote: >> int cpuid_hypervisor_leaves( uint32_t idx, uint32_t sub_idx, >> uint32_t *eax, uint32_t *ebx, uint32_t *ecx, uint32_t *edx) >> { >> struct domain *d = current->domain; >> /* Optionally shift out of the way of Viridian architectural leaves. */ >> - uint32_t base = is_viridian_domain(d) ? 0x40000100 : 0x40000000; >> + uint32_t base = 0x40000000; >> uint32_t limit; >> >> + if ( is_viridian_domain(d) ) >> + base += 0x100; >> + if ( is_vmware_domain(d) ) >> + base += 0x100; >> + > > These bases need a far more scalable solution, especially as the result > of each of these clauses can be changed at runtime with a cunning > hvm_param_set hypercall. > > I think that both "is pretending to be HyperV" and "is pretending to be > VMware" need to be domain creation flags which are strictly static for > the lifetime of the domain. And it seems highly questionable to me whether having both at the same time makes much sense. Plus the new function doesn't belong in xen/arch/x86/traps.c ... Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |