[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 2/6] xen/arm: track the state of guest IRQs



On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 15:17 +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:

> > > +            set_int = 1;
> > > +        }
> > > +
> > > +        clear_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_VISIBLE, &p->status);
> > > +
> > > +        if ( !list_empty(&v->arch.vgic.lr_pending) ) {
> > > +            p2 = list_entry(v->arch.vgic.lr_pending.next, typeof(*p2), 
> > > lr_queue);
> > > +            gic_set_lr(i, p2->irq, GICH_LR_PENDING, p2->priority);
> > > +            list_del_init(&p2->lr_queue);
> > > +            set_bit(i, &this_cpu(lr_mask));
> > > +            set_int = 1;
> > > +        }
> > > +        spin_unlock_irq(&gic.lock);
> > > +
> > > +        spin_lock_irq(&v->arch.vgic.lock);
> > >          list_del_init(&p->inflight);
> > >          spin_unlock_irq(&v->arch.vgic.lock);
> > >  
> > > @@ -931,6 +955,12 @@ static void maintenance_interrupt(int irq, void 
> > > *dev_id, struct cpu_user_regs *r
> > >  
> > >          i++;
> > >      }
> > > +    if ( !set_int )
> > > +    {
> > > +        spin_lock_irq(&gic.lock);
> > 
> > Dropping the lock and then retaking it here is a bit of a suspicious
> > pattern -- what if something changes in the interim?
> 
> Vcpu A has EOIed a guest IRQ, causing a maintenance_interrupt.
> At the same time vcpu B is trying to inject a new interrupt into the
> vcpu A.
> 
> 
> A: maintenance_interrupt: set_int = 0
> B: create a new inflight irq for A
> B: send an IPI
> A: receive an IPI
> A: gic_inject->gic_inject_irq_start
> A: maintenance_interrupt: gic_inject_irq_stop
> A: gic_inject->gic_inject_irq_start
> 
> 
> It works! :)

What is the last "A: gic_inject->gic_inject_irq_start" from?



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.