[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 2/6] xen/arm: track the state of guest IRQs
On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 15:17 +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > + set_int = 1; > > > + } > > > + > > > + clear_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_VISIBLE, &p->status); > > > + > > > + if ( !list_empty(&v->arch.vgic.lr_pending) ) { > > > + p2 = list_entry(v->arch.vgic.lr_pending.next, typeof(*p2), > > > lr_queue); > > > + gic_set_lr(i, p2->irq, GICH_LR_PENDING, p2->priority); > > > + list_del_init(&p2->lr_queue); > > > + set_bit(i, &this_cpu(lr_mask)); > > > + set_int = 1; > > > + } > > > + spin_unlock_irq(&gic.lock); > > > + > > > + spin_lock_irq(&v->arch.vgic.lock); > > > list_del_init(&p->inflight); > > > spin_unlock_irq(&v->arch.vgic.lock); > > > > > > @@ -931,6 +955,12 @@ static void maintenance_interrupt(int irq, void > > > *dev_id, struct cpu_user_regs *r > > > > > > i++; > > > } > > > + if ( !set_int ) > > > + { > > > + spin_lock_irq(&gic.lock); > > > > Dropping the lock and then retaking it here is a bit of a suspicious > > pattern -- what if something changes in the interim? > > Vcpu A has EOIed a guest IRQ, causing a maintenance_interrupt. > At the same time vcpu B is trying to inject a new interrupt into the > vcpu A. > > > A: maintenance_interrupt: set_int = 0 > B: create a new inflight irq for A > B: send an IPI > A: receive an IPI > A: gic_inject->gic_inject_irq_start > A: maintenance_interrupt: gic_inject_irq_stop > A: gic_inject->gic_inject_irq_start > > > It works! :) What is the last "A: gic_inject->gic_inject_irq_start" from? _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |