Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 6/6] xen/arm: disable a physical IRQ when the guest disables the corresponding IRQ

[Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 11 Dec 2013, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 18:36 +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Dec 2013, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 13:06 +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > > Changes in v2:
> > > > - disable IRQs that were previously disabled.
> > > 
> > > These should be after a "---" marker, you've done this wrong
> > > consistently in this series.
> >  
> > Unfortunately guilt doesn't support it. The content I write after "---"
> > would get lost.
> 
> I suppose guilt uses the same tool as git am to actual apply the patches
> on push, so it trims the comments too :-(
> 
> > I have the same problem with patch series I send to QEMU and Linux.
> > I can either do what I have been doing or avoid writing the log on each
> > patch and limiting myself to writing the log to patch #0.
> > So far I have been keeping the log as part of the commit messages.
> 
> Sounds like a pretty major shortcoming of the tool TBH, perhaps time to
> investigate alternatives?
> 
> Perhaps git smudge/clean filters could be used such that some other
> string is ("--- CUT ME"?) stored in .git/guilt/patches/blah and is
> converted on push/refresh etc to ---?

I manually edited guilt to avoid cutting off things after --- and before
the diff.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel