[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [BUG] Xen vm kernel crash in get_free_entries.
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 01:57:37PM +0100, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: > > Friday, November 29, 2013, 12:54:16 PM, you wrote: > > > On Thu, 28 Nov 2013, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 02:56:53PM +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > >> > On Tue, 26 Nov 2013, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > >> > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 09:40:58AM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > >> > > > On Tue, 2013-11-12 at 10:56 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > >> > > > > On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 01:47:03PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > >> > > > > > On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 09:20 +0400, Astarta wrote: > >> > > > > > > Hello, > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Let me bring some new life to this discussion. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > I've investigated a bit and found another way to make kernels > >> > > > > > > starting > >> > > > > > > from 3.8.x to boot on the VMs with platform device_id 0002. > >> > > > > > > Reverting of > >> > > > > > > xen-grant-table-correctly-initialize-grant-table-version-1 > >> > > > > > > patch is not necessary. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > We can simply modify struct pci_device_id platform_pci_tbl[] > >> > > > > > > (in > >> > > > > > > drivers/xen/platform-pci.c) to respect 0002 and 0000 device > >> > > > > > > ids. > >> > > > > > > That makes the kernel (3.8.x and 3.11.6) to boot correctly, > >> > > > > > > disks and > >> > > > > > > network are also recognized. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > I think this is just working around the problem, by avoiding the > >> > > > > > situation where the error occurs. You could just as well switch > >> > > > > > to > >> > > > > > platform device id < 2. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > I am bit late to this discussion - but shouldn't there be something > >> > > > > in the kernel to deal with this? > >> > > > > >> > > > Well, ideally the kernel wouldn't crash ;-) > >> > > > >> > > This patch should solve that (untested, but at least compile tested): > >> > > Please test it. > >> > > > >> > > >From f7d3581aa19a35ea3ff10b965b2b08843e923635 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > >> > > From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > > Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 15:05:40 -0500 > >> > > Subject: [PATCH] xen/pvhvm: If xen_platform_pci=0 is set don't blow up. > >> > > > >> > > *TODO* > >> > > > >> > > Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > > --- > >> > > drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c | 2 +- > >> > > drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c | 4 ++++ > >> > > drivers/net/xen-netfront.c | 2 +- > >> > > drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe_frontend.c | 2 +- > >> > > include/xen/platform_pci.h | 13 +++++++++++++ > >> > > 5 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > >> > > > >> > > diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c > >> > > b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c > >> > > index 432db1b..bcbaf0b 100644 > >> > > --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c > >> > > +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c > >> > > @@ -2074,7 +2074,7 @@ static int __init xlblk_init(void) > >> > > if (!xen_domain()) > >> > > return -ENODEV; > >> > > > >> > > - if (xen_hvm_domain() && !xen_platform_pci_unplug) > >> > > + if (xen_err_out()) > >> > > return -ENODEV; > >> > > > >> > > if (register_blkdev(XENVBD_MAJOR, DEV_NAME)) { > >> > > diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c > >> > > b/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c > >> > > index e21c181..9d250cf 100644 > >> > > --- a/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c > >> > > +++ b/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c > >> > > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ > >> > > #include <xen/interface/io/fbif.h> > >> > > #include <xen/interface/io/kbdif.h> > >> > > #include <xen/xenbus.h> > >> > > +#include <xen/platform_pci.h> > >> > > > >> > > struct xenkbd_info { > >> > > struct input_dev *kbd; > >> > > @@ -380,6 +381,9 @@ static int __init xenkbd_init(void) > >> > > if (xen_initial_domain()) > >> > > return -ENODEV; > >> > > > >> > > + if (xen_err_out()) > >> > > + return -ENODEV; > >> > > >> > Why do we error out here? There is nothing to unplug in this case. > >> > >> B/c otherwise the driver blows up when it acts on the XenBus and tries > >> to setup a grant. But the grant is initialized by the xen-platform-pci > >> which is not run. > > > I see. Adding this check must be the real purpose of the patch then? > > In that case don't we need another check like this one in: > > > drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c:xen_tpmfront_init > > drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c:pcifront_init > > > and for consistency (it doesn't use grants right now) > > > drivers/video/xen-fbfront.c:xenfb_init > > > ? > > > Hi Konrad / Stefano, > > Is there any follow up on this ? I need to respin it. Um, will do that later on today. Thanks for poking me! > > -- > Sander > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |