[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] ARINC653

To: "Dario Faggioli" <dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Simon Martin" <smartin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 11:55:24 +0000
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, josh.whitehead@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Nate Studer <nate.studer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Robbie VanVossen <robert.vanvossen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 11:55:57 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

Hi Dario,

Pool-0 has pcpu 1, 2 and 3

pv499 has pcpu 0.

Can you try the opposite? I mean, something like having the 1 pCPU only

pool when you run your domU *not* including pCPU #0?

I changed it so that Pool-0 has pcpu 0, 1 and 2, and pv499 has pcpu 3. No difference. Which is good in a way :-).

Regards.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

References:
- Re: [Xen-devel] ARINC653
  - From: Dario Faggioli

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH net v2] xen-netback: fix abuse of napi budget
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.1-testing test] 22376: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] ARINC653
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [Qemu-devel] [Bug 1257099] [NEW] QEMU fails to build on CentOS 5.10 with relocation R_X86_64_PC32 error
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.