|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch v3 3/4] tools/libxl: Fix libxl__device_nic_from_xs_be()
On 26/11/13 15:39, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch v3 3/4] tools/libxl: Fix
> libxl__device_nic_from_xs_be()"):
>> On 26/11/13 15:08, Ian Jackson wrote:
>>> From: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 12:08:09 +0000
>>> Subject: [PATCH] libxl: Fix error handling in libxl__device_nic_from_xs_be
> ...
>>> Introduce here a READ_BACKEND macro to make the code less repetitive.
> I was thinking about READ_BACKEND and wondered whether we should have
> something like this in libxl_internal.h:
>
> /*
> * const char *XSREADF_OR_RCOUT(libxl__gc*, const char *format, ...);
> *
> * Reads the xenstore key at sprintf(format, ...).
> * On success returns the string (from the gc tgc), or NULL for ENOENT.
> * On other errors, logs, sets rc, and does "goto out".
> *
> * Expects in its scope:
> * libxl__gc *gc; // for the sprintf
> * int rc; // trashed
> * out: // used on error only; jumped to with rc set
> */
> #define XSREADF_OR_RCOUT(tgc, format, ...) ({ \
> const char *xsreadf_tmp; \
> rc = libxl__xs_read_checked((tgc), XBT_NULL, \
> GCSPRINTF((format), __VA_ARGS__), \
> &xsreadf_tmp); \
> if (rc) goto out; \
> xsreadf_tmp; \
> )}
>
> We don't presently have anywhere in libxl_internal.h that assumes the
> existence of "out" and "rc" in their scope.
>
> Ian.
So what is happening with this? The fix in the parent email should be
ok, and might be better this late in the development cycle.
~Andrew
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |