[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V5 0/4] Make OVMF work with Xen
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 10:01:01AM +0100, Fabio Fantoni wrote: > Il 05/12/2013 18:29, Wei Liu ha scritto: > >This is version 5 of Xen side patches. Patches that have been applied are not > >resent. > > > >Two patches to build system are added to this series. > > > >Still waiting for OVMF side patches to get merged. The main purpose for > >sending > >this series is to let people review the newly added build system patches. > > > >Wei. > > > >Changes in V5: > >* add patches for build system > > > >Changes in V4: > >* go back to dedicated OVMF info structure, 64 bit ready > > > >Changes in V3: > >* move seabios_info to common code > >* e820 entry number is 16 again, one can bump it when necessary > >* reserve low reset vector in E820 map in OVMF > > > >Changes in V2: > >* ovmf_info is now almost the same as seabios_info > >* bump e820 entry number to 128 > >* modify build_e820_table to avoid BIOS region reservation if there's none > > > >Wei Liu (4): > > hvmloader/ovmf: setup ovmf_info > > hvmloader/ovmf: setup E820 map > > tools: enable OVMF build for Linux by default > > tools/ovmf-makefile: only build debug target when specified > > > > tools/configure | 24 ++++++++------- > > tools/configure.ac | 17 ++++++++++- > > tools/firmware/hvmloader/ovmf.c | 61 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > > tools/firmware/ovmf-makefile | 19 ++++++++---- > > 4 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > > > > Is "libxl: bump LIBXL_MAXMEM_CONSTANT to 2048" patch no longer needed? > No, it's not necessary anymore. Wei. > Thanks for any reply. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |