[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [V3 PATCH 9/9] pvh dom0: add opt_dom0pvh to setup.c
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013 12:38:12 -0800 Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 2 Dec 2013 20:38:26 +0100 > Roger Pau Monnà <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 02/12/13 20:30, Mukesh Rathor wrote: > > > On Mon, 2 Dec 2013 16:09:50 +0100 > > > Roger Pau Monnà <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > ...... > > Thanks for the input, I haven't been able to do much debugging, but > > AFAICT the problem comes from alloc_vcpu_guest_context returning > > NULL, because alloc_domheap_page(NULL, 0) inside of that function > > also returned NULL (not able to allocate a page). > > > > I'm currently using your tree for both Linux (branch tmp2) and Xen > > (branch dom0pvh-v3), no added or removed patches (only the line > > mentioned above in order to boot Dom0 in PVH mode). > > > > Can you confirm you are able to boot a PVH Dom0 from you Xen and > > Linux trees? > > yes, I'd not be submitting the patches otherwise ;).. > > Name ID Mem VCPUs > State Time(s) Domain-0 0 > 1200 3 r----- 6250.6 FWIW, here's my command line: kernel /xen.hybrid.kdb console=com1,vga com1=57600,8n1 dom0_mem=1200M maxcpus=4 dom0_max_vcpus=3 noreboot sync_console dom0pvh module /bzImage.hyb ro root=/dev/sda10 console=tty console=hvc0,57600n8 Something is going with memory on your system looks like, the line Released 18446744073708661104 pages of unused memory is worrysome. May be start with dom0_mem and see if that makes a difference? OTOH, after I am done cranking out another dom0 version with Jan's comments, I'll try out on my system without dom0_mem specified. That make take a day or two. thanks, Mukesh _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |