|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [V3 PATCH 9/9] pvh dom0: add opt_dom0pvh to setup.c
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013 12:38:12 -0800
Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Dec 2013 20:38:26 +0100
> Roger Pau Monnà <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On 02/12/13 20:30, Mukesh Rathor wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2 Dec 2013 16:09:50 +0100
> > > Roger Pau Monnà <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> ......
> > Thanks for the input, I haven't been able to do much debugging, but
> > AFAICT the problem comes from alloc_vcpu_guest_context returning
> > NULL, because alloc_domheap_page(NULL, 0) inside of that function
> > also returned NULL (not able to allocate a page).
> >
> > I'm currently using your tree for both Linux (branch tmp2) and Xen
> > (branch dom0pvh-v3), no added or removed patches (only the line
> > mentioned above in order to boot Dom0 in PVH mode).
> >
> > Can you confirm you are able to boot a PVH Dom0 from you Xen and
> > Linux trees?
>
> yes, I'd not be submitting the patches otherwise ;)..
>
> Name ID Mem VCPUs
> State Time(s) Domain-0 0
> 1200 3 r----- 6250.6
FWIW, here's my command line:
kernel /xen.hybrid.kdb console=com1,vga com1=57600,8n1 dom0_mem=1200M
maxcpus=4 dom0_max_vcpus=3 noreboot sync_console dom0pvh
module /bzImage.hyb ro root=/dev/sda10 console=tty console=hvc0,57600n8
Something is going with memory on your system looks like, the line
Released 18446744073708661104 pages of unused memory
is worrysome. May be start with dom0_mem and see if that makes a difference?
OTOH, after I am done cranking out another dom0 version with Jan's
comments, I'll try out on my system without dom0_mem specified. That
make take a day or two.
thanks,
Mukesh
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |