Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/5] X86 architecture instruction set extension definiation

[Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 19/11/13 10:49, Liu, Jinsong wrote:
> From eee3a3d3072651327453220876ebe9a7345d6ffe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Liu Jinsong <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 18:44:45 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH 2/5] X86 architecture instruction set extension definiation
>
> Intel has released new version of Intel Architecture Instruction Set
> Extensions Programming Reference, add new features like AVX-512, MPX, etc.
> refer http://download-software.intel.com/sites/default/files/319433-015.pdf
>
> This patch adds definiation of these new instruction set extension. It also
> adjusts valid xcr0 checking.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  xen/arch/x86/xstate.c        |   38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  xen/include/asm-x86/xstate.h |   13 +++++++++----
>  2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/xstate.c b/xen/arch/x86/xstate.c
> index 9e74929..1fd43c9 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/xstate.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/xstate.c
> @@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ void xstate_free_save_area(struct vcpu *v)
>  /* Collect the information of processor's extended state */
>  void xstate_init(bool_t bsp)
>  {
> -    u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx, min_size;
> +    u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
>      u64 feature_mask;
>  
>      if ( boot_cpu_data.cpuid_level < XSTATE_CPUID )
> @@ -269,12 +269,6 @@ void xstate_init(bool_t bsp)
>      BUG_ON((eax & XSTATE_YMM) && !(eax & XSTATE_SSE));
>      feature_mask = (((u64)edx << 32) | eax) & XCNTXT_MASK;
>  
> -    /* FP/SSE, XSAVE.HEADER, YMM */
> -    min_size =  XSTATE_AREA_MIN_SIZE;
> -    if ( eax & XSTATE_YMM )
> -        min_size += XSTATE_YMM_SIZE;
> -    BUG_ON(ecx < min_size);
> -
>      /*
>       * Set CR4_OSXSAVE and run "cpuid" to get xsave_cntxt_size.
>       */
> @@ -327,14 +321,33 @@ unsigned int xstate_ctxt_size(u64 xcr0)
>      return ebx;
>  }
>  
> +static bool_t valid_xcr0(u64 xcr0)
> +{

Valid states in xcr0 ave very complicated, and are really not helped by
having the dependencies split across several manuals.

I feel that for the sanity of someone trying to follow the code, there
should be comments, and bits are validated in position order.

So,

/* XSTATE_FP must be unconditionally set */

> +    if ( !(xcr0 & XSTATE_FP) )
> +        return 0;
> +

/* XSTATE_YMM depends on XSTATE_SSE */

> +    if ( (xcr0 & XSTATE_YMM) && !(xcr0 & XSTATE_SSE) )
> +        return 0;

/* XSTATE_BNDREGS and BNDCSR must be the same */
if ( (xcr0 & XSTATE_BNDREGS) ^ (xcr0 & XSTATE_BNDCSR) )
     return 0;


/* XSTATE_{OPMASK,ZMM,HI_ZMM} must be the same, and require XSTATE_YMM */

> +
> +    if ( xcr0 & (XSTATE_OPMASK | XSTATE_ZMM | XSTATE_HI_ZMM) )
> +    {
> +        if ( !(xcr0 & XSTATE_YMM) )
> +            return 0;
> +
> +        if ( ~xcr0 & (XSTATE_OPMASK | XSTATE_ZMM | XSTATE_HI_ZMM) )
> +            return 0;
> +    }
> +

return 1;

Shouldn't there also be a test against the xfeat_mask here, rather than
at all callers ?

> +    return !(xcr0 & XSTATE_BNDREGS) == !(xcr0 & XSTATE_BNDCSR);
> +}
> +
>  int validate_xstate(u64 xcr0, u64 xcr0_accum, u64 xstate_bv, u64 xfeat_mask)
>  {
>      if ( (xcr0_accum & ~xfeat_mask) ||
>           (xstate_bv & ~xcr0_accum) ||
>           (xcr0 & ~xcr0_accum) ||
> -         !(xcr0 & XSTATE_FP) ||
> -         ((xcr0 & XSTATE_YMM) && !(xcr0 & XSTATE_SSE)) ||
> -         ((xcr0_accum & XSTATE_YMM) && !(xcr0_accum & XSTATE_SSE)) )
> +         !valid_xcr0(xcr0) ||
> +         !valid_xcr0(xcr0_accum) )
>          return -EINVAL;
>  
>      if ( xcr0_accum & ~xfeature_mask )
> @@ -351,10 +364,7 @@ int handle_xsetbv(u32 index, u64 new_bv)
>      if ( index != XCR_XFEATURE_ENABLED_MASK )
>          return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  
> -    if ( (new_bv & ~xfeature_mask) || !(new_bv & XSTATE_FP) )
> -        return -EINVAL;
> -
> -    if ( (new_bv & XSTATE_YMM) && !(new_bv & XSTATE_SSE) )
> +    if ( (new_bv & ~xfeature_mask) || !valid_xcr0(new_bv) )
>          return -EINVAL;
>  
>      if ( !set_xcr0(new_bv) )
> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/xstate.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/xstate.h
> index 5617963..de5711e 100644
> --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/xstate.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/xstate.h
> @@ -20,18 +20,23 @@
>  #define XCR_XFEATURE_ENABLED_MASK 0x00000000  /* index of XCR0 */
>  
>  #define XSTATE_YMM_SIZE           256
> -#define XSTATE_YMM_OFFSET         XSAVE_AREA_MIN_SIZE
>  #define XSTATE_AREA_MIN_SIZE      (512 + 64)  /* FP/SSE + XSAVE.HEADER */
>  
>  #define XSTATE_FP      (1ULL << 0)
>  #define XSTATE_SSE     (1ULL << 1)
>  #define XSTATE_YMM     (1ULL << 2)
> +#define XSTATE_BNDREGS (1ULL << 3)
> +#define XSTATE_BNDCSR  (1ULL << 4)
> +#define XSTATE_OPMASK  (1ULL << 5)
> +#define XSTATE_ZMM     (1ULL << 6)
> +#define XSTATE_HI_ZMM  (1ULL << 7)
>  #define XSTATE_LWP     (1ULL << 62) /* AMD lightweight profiling */
>  #define XSTATE_FP_SSE  (XSTATE_FP | XSTATE_SSE)
> -#define XCNTXT_MASK    (XSTATE_FP | XSTATE_SSE | XSTATE_YMM | XSTATE_LWP)
> +#define XCNTXT_MASK    (XSTATE_FP | XSTATE_SSE | XSTATE_YMM | XSTATE_OPMASK 
> | \
> +                        XSTATE_ZMM | XSTATE_HI_ZMM | XSTATE_NONLAZY)
>  
> -#define XSTATE_ALL     (~0)
> -#define XSTATE_NONLAZY (XSTATE_LWP)
> +#define XSTATE_ALL     (~(1ULL << 63))

Why has XSTATE_ALL changed to ~XSTATE_LWP ?

> +#define XSTATE_NONLAZY (XSTATE_LWP | XSTATE_BNDREGS | XSTATE_BNDCSR)
>  #define XSTATE_LAZY    (XSTATE_ALL & ~XSTATE_NONLAZY)
>  
>  extern u64 xfeature_mask;


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel