Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 11/14] libxl: get and set soft affinity

[Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On mer, 2013-11-20 at 14:45 +0000, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 20/11/13 11:40, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > That would probably the best option, at least for now. Of course, I can
> > add "introduce a new IDL type for bitfields" to my TODO list, and send a
> > followup patch for 4.5.
> 
> But if we end up doing as IanC suggests -- having a new function which 
> accepts two pointers, either of which can be NULL -- then the need for 
> these OR-able flags goes away, doesn't it?
> 
Good point, it indeed does. I just became even more a fan of that
solution then. :-D

Regards,
Dario

-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel